Methodological and theoretical frameworks for the design of community information systems

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Harrison, Teresa M ^a   Zappen, James P ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; USER INTERFACES; WEBSITES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMMUNITY INFORMATION SYSTEM; COMPUTER SCIENCE RESEARCH; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT); RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 2942726576     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00212.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bødker, S. (1996). Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 215-236.
2. Bødker, S., & Grønbæk, K. (1996). Users and designers in mutual activity: An analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 130-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bødker, S., Grønbæk, K., & Kyng, M. (1993). Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 157-175). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Cherry, C. (1985). The age of access: Information technology and social revolution. Edited by W. Edmondson. London: Croom Helm.
5. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Couch, C. J. (1996). Information technologies and social orders. Hawthorn, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
7. Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation, in Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Engeström, Y. (1999b). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fountain, J. (2001). Building the virtual state. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
11. Harrison, T. M., Zappen, J. P., & Prell, C. (2002). Transforming new communication technologies into community media. In N. W. Jankowski (Ed.) with O. Prehn, Community media in the information age: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 249- 269). Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press.
12. Harrison, T. M., Zappen, J. P., Stephen, T., Garfield, P., & Prell, C. (2001). Building an electronic community: A town-gown collaboration. In G. J. Shepherd & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), Communication and community (pp.201-216), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Harrison, T. M., & Zappen, J. P. (1999). Writing across the community: Integrating new communication technology and service education. Fourth Writing Across the Curriculum Conference, Cornell University, June.
14. Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2002). The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 1-21). London: Sage.
15. Mansell, R., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.) (1996). Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Mansell, R. (1996). Communication by design. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 15-43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Schuler, D. (1996b). How to kill community networks. Hint: We may have already started. Retrieved March, 2003, from http://www.scn.org/ip/commnet/kill- commnets.html.
18. Schuler, D. (1997). Community computer networks: An opportunity for collaboration among democratic technology practitioners and researchers. Retrieved August, 1998, from http://www.scn.orq/ip/commnet/oslo-1997.text.
19. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Star, S. L., & Bowker. G. C. (2002). How to infrastructure. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 151-162). London: Sage.
21. Simon, H. A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research? Action research international. Retrieved March, 2003, from http://www.scu.edu.au/ schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-wadsworth98.html.
23. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Zappen, J. P., Harrison, T. M.,Moore, V., & Williams, A. (2002). Designing a collaborative community information system. In R. Carveth, S. B. Kretchmer & D. Schuler (Eds.), Shaping the network society: Patterns for participation, action and change. May 16-May 19, 2002, Seattle, Washington: Proceedings (pp. 276-279). Palo Alto, California: Public Sphere Project of Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.