Representing “neighborhood”: Growth coalitions, newspaper reporting, and gentrification in st. Louis

Professional Geographer

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 282-294

  Wilson, David ^a   Mueller, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gentrification; Growth coalitions; Neighborhoods; Representation

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC REGENERATION; GENTRIFICATION; MEDIA ROLE; NEIGHBORHOOD; URBAN RENEWAL;

MISSOURI; NORTH AMERICA; SAINT LOUIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942722398     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05602011.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allen, J. P., and E. Turner. 1996. Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation. Professional Geographer 48:140-55.
2. Barnes, T. 1996. Logics of dislocation. New York: Guilford.
3. Barnes, T., and J. Duncan. 1991. Writing worlds: Discourse, text and metaphor in the representation of landscape. London: Routledge.
4. Boyer, C. 1984. Making the ration id city. Boston: MIT Press.
5. Boyle, M. 1997. Civic boosterism in the politics of local economic development: “Institutional positions” and “strategic orientations” in the consumption of h a 11 ma rk events. Environment and Planning A 29:1975-97.
6. Chic Progress. 1998. City progress: People and government. Technical report of the St. Louis Civic Progress Association.
7. Civic Progress Annual Report. 1996. Technical report, City of St. Louis.
8. Fairclaugh, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. New York: Longman.
9. Filstead, H. 1970. Qualitative methodology. Chicago: Markham.
10. Greene, R. 1997. Chicago’s new immigrants, indigenous poor, and edge cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 551:178-90.
11. Gregory, D., R. Martin, and G. Smith. 1994. Introduction: Human geography, social change and social science, hi Human geography: Society, space, and social science, ed. D. Gregory, R. Martin, and G. Smith, 1-21. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
12. Hamnett, C. 2000. Gentrification, postindustrialism, and industrial and occupational restructuring in global cities. In A companion to the city, ed. G. Bridge and S. Watson, 132-45. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Harvey, D. 1989a. The postmodern condition. London: Blackwell.
14. Harvey, D. 1989b. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71: 3-17.
15. Haworth, A., and T. Manzi. 1999. Managing the ‘underclass’: Interpreting die moral discourse of housing management. Urban Studies 36:153-65.
16. Hull, J. M. 2001. Do you diink I’m stupid? Echoes 19:12-17.
17. Jablonsky, T. 1993. Pride in the jungle. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Jacobs, K, and J. Kemeny. 1999. The struggle to define homelessness: A constructionist approach. In Hontelessness: Public policies and private troubles, ed. S. Hutson and D. Clapham. London: Cassals.
19. Jonas, A., and D. Wilson. 1999. Urbati growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later. Albany: State University of New York Press.
20. Jones, R. R., J. Portz, and L. Stein. 1997. The nature of civic involvement and educational change in Pittsburgh, Boston, and St. Louis. Urban Affairs Quarterly 32 (6): 871-91.
21. Kenny, J. 1995. Making Milwaukee famous: Cultural capital, urban image, and the politics of place. Urban Geography 16:440-58.
22. Knopp, L. 1990. Exploiting the rent-gap: The theoretical significance of using illegal appraisal schemes to encourage gentrification in New Orleans. Urban Geography 11:48-64.
23. Knox, P. 1997. Globalization and urban economic change. Armais of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 551:21-32.
24. Knox, P., and S. Pinch. 2000. Urban social geography: Ati introduction. New York: Prentice Hall.
25. Lauria, M. 1999. Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulation theory and institutionalist ar-rangements. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later, ed. A E. G. Jonas and D. Wilson, 125-40. Albany: State University of New York Press.
26. Lees, L. 1996. In the pursuit of difference: Representations of gentrification. Environment and plan-ningA 14:453-70.
27. Leitner, H. 1990. Cities in pursuit of economic growth: The local state as entrepreneur. Political Geography Quarterly 9:146-70.
28. Ley, D. 1987. Styles of die times: Liberal and conservative landscapes in inner city Vancouver 1968-86. Journal of Historical Geography 13:40-56.
29. Ley, D., and J. Mercer. 1980. Locational conflict and the politics of consumption. Economic Geography 56:89-109.
30. Logan, J., and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Malveaux, J. 1993. The future of urban areas. Black Scholar 23:11-15.
32. Mele, C. 2000. Real estate, culture, and change on New York City’s Lower East Side. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Molotch, H. 1999. Growth machine links: Up, down, and across. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later, ed. A. Jonas and D. Wilson, 247-67. Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Mueller, T. 1999. The analysis of sports oriented development discourse in St. Louis, Missouri. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
35. Nyden, P. 1991. Uneven development. Albany: State University of New’ York Press.
36. Omni, M., and H. Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.
37. Parisi, P., and B. Holcomb. 1994. Symbolizing place: Journalistic narratives of the city. Urban Geography \ 5:3 76-94.
38. Pew Center for Civic Journalism. 2001. Civic journalism: True stories from America’s liew’srooms. Technical document. Pew’ Charitable Trust.
39. Public Policy Research Center. 2001a. Promoting economic well-being among the poor through microenterprise initiatives in the United States. Research report. University of Missouri-St. Louis.
40. Public Policy Research Center. 2001b. Downtown revitalization: Key trends and practices. Research report. University of Missouri-St. Louis.
41. Rex, J. 1986. Race and ethnicity Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
42. Roberts, S. 1991. A critical evaluation of the city lifecycle idea. Urban Geography 12:431-39.
43. Short, J. 1999. Urban imagineers: Boosterism and the representation of cities. In The urban growth machine: Critical perspectives two decades later, ed. A E. G. Jonas and D. Wilson. Albany: State University of New’ York Press.
44. Smith, N. 1996. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revatichist city. New’ York: Routledge.
45. St. Louis Business Journal. 2000. World Wide’s Steward named to civic progress. Sept. 20.
46. St. Louis Cultural Resources Office. 1999. Discussion with Head. October 5.
47. St. Louis Planning Commission. 2000. Neighborhoods in St. Louis. Technical report. City of St. Louis.
48. U.S. Census Bureau. 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, and 2000. Data on housing and population.
49. U.S. National Commission on Neighborhoods. 1968. People, building neighborhoods. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50. Wacquant, L. 1992. Redrawing the urban color line: The state of die ghetto in die 1980s. In Social problems, ed. C. Calhoun and G. Ritzer, 2-28. New’ York: McGraw Hill.
51. Ward, R. C., and E. R. Kilgen. 1997. Rebuilding midtown St. Louis. Urbati Land 56 (April): 42-6.
52. Warf, B., and B. Holly. 1997. The rise and fall and rise of Cleveland. Armais of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 551 (May): 208-21.
53. Wei, J. M. 2000. An analysis ofthe metaphorical usage of campaign slogans in the 1996 presidential campaign in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 10:93-114.
54. Widick, B.J. 1972. Detroit: City of race and class violence. Detroit: Wayne State University.
55. Wilson, B. 2000. America ‘sjoharmesberg: Industrialization and racial transformation in Birmingham. Lan-ham, MD: Rowman and Litdefield.
56. Wilson, D. 1991. Urban change, circuits of capital, and uneven development. Professional Geographer 4:403-16.
57. Wilson, D. 1993. Everyday life, spatiality, and inner city disinvestment in a U.S. city. International Journal of Urban and Regiotial Research 17:578-94.
58. Wilson, D. 1996. Metaphors, growth coalition discourse, and black poverty neighborhoods in a U.S. City. Antipode 28:72-97.
59. Wilson, D., and D. Grammenos. 2000. Progress report: Spatiality and urban redevelopment movements. Urban Geography 21:361-71.
60. Wright, T. 2001. Discussion with organizer, St. Louis, 10 November.
61. Wyly, E., and D. J. Hammel. 2000. Cities and the reinvestment wave: Underserved markets and the gentrification of housing policy. Housing Policy Debate 2 (Spring): 56-87.
62. Yin, R. 1994. Qualitative methods. Newbury Park: Sage.