Three challenges for the survival of memetics

Journal of Memetics

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 64-68

  Edmonds, Bruce ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942717036     PISSN: 13664786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Blackmore, S. (1999) The Meme Machine. Oxford; New York : Oxford University Press.
2. Edmonds, B. (1998). On Modelling in Memetics. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/ 1998/vol2/edmonds_b.html
3. Gatherer, D. (1998) Why the Thought Contagion Metaphor is Retarding the Progress of Memetics. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, 2. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/gatherer_d.html
4. Hull, D. (2000) Taking Memetics Seriously: Memetics will be what we make it. In Aunger, R. (ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford: Oxford university Press, 43-67.
5. Kuhn, T. (1969) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227: 520-521.
7. Price, G. R. 1972. Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Annals of Human Genetics 35:485-489.
8. Rose, N., 1998; Controversies in Meme Theory.Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission,2.http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/ vol2/rose_n.html
9. Opie, I. and Opie, P. (eds.) (1997) The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes. Oxford; New York : Oxford University Press.