|
|
Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 147-148
|
|
Eminence, or rather eloquence, or rather economy-based medicine?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BLADDER PERFORATION;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COLPOSUSPENSION;
COMORBIDITY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
ECONOMIC ASPECT;
EDITORIAL;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
EXPERIENCE;
FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MEDICAL LITERATURE;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
MICTURITION DISORDER;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;
PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED KINGDOM;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
|
|
EID: 2942716915
PISSN: 09373462
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1147-7 Document Type: Editorial |
|
Times cited : (12)
|
|
References (2)
|
