Comparison of speech perception between monaural and binaural hearing in cochlear implant patients

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 358-362

  Iwaki, Takako ^a   Matsushiro, Naoki ^a   Mah, Shu Ran ^a   Sato, Takashi ^a   Yasuoka, Eri ^a   Yamamoto, Ko Ichi ^a   Kubo, Takeshi ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bimodal hearing; Cochlear implant; Event related potential; Japanese Hearing in Noise Test; P300 latency; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BINAURAL HEARING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH;

EID: 2942706239     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480310000548a     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Byrne D. Clinical issues and options in binaural hearing aid fitting. Ear Hear 1981; 2: 187-93.
2. Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 146-54.
3. Oviatt DL, Kilney PR. Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol 1991; 1: 48-55.
4. Kaga K, Kodera K, Hirota E, Tsuzuki T. P300 response to tones and speech sounds after cochlear implant: a case report. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 905-7.
5. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DW, McGee TJ, Carrel TD, Sharma A, et al. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 514-20.
6. Okusa M, Shiraishi T, Kubo T, Nageishi Y. Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121: 610-5.
7. Kubo T, Yamamoto K, Iwaki T, Matsukawa M, Doi K, Tamura M. Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121: 257-61.
8. Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan J. Development of the Hearing In Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085-99.
9. Shiroma M, Iwaki T, Kubo T, Soli S. Development of a Japanese version of the hearing in noise test. In: Kubo T, Takahashi Y, Iwaki T, editors. Cochlear implants update. The Hague, The Netherlands: Karger; 2001. p. 209-11.
10. Müller J, Schön F, Helms J. Speech understanding in quiet and noise in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 198-206.
11. van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Fusion and lateralization study with two binaural cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; Suppl 166: 233-5.
12. Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Parkinson AJ, Wolaver A, et al. Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 80S-9S.