Short-term study of the effect of speech coding strategy on the auditory performance of pre- and post-lingually deafened adults implanted with the clarion CII®

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 124, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 368-370

  Filipo, R ^a   Mancini, P ^a,b   Ballantyne, D ^a   Bosco, E ^a   D'Elia, C ^a  

^a Centra Inter Univ Ric P   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Continuous Interleaved Sampling; Hi Resolution; Simultaneous Analog Strategy; Speech in noise; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPEECH; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942702364     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480410016324     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Farmer Jr JC, Lawson DT, Weber BA, Wolford RD, et al. Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1988; 98: 1069-77.
2. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236-8.
3. Amigoni, E, Todini, L., Test verbale della percozione uditiva. Nume Del Bol. Aurion Srl, Milano, Italy: 1997.
4. Cotugno F, Prosser S, Turrini M. Audiometria vocale. Montegrotto terme, PD, Italy: GN Resound, 2000.
5. Osberger MJ, Fisher L. SAS-CIS preference study in postlingually deafened adults implanted with the Clarion® cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 74-9.
6. Stollwerck LE, Goodrum-Clarke K, Lynch C, Armstrong-Bednall G, Nunn T, Markoff L, et al. Speech processing strategy preference among 55 European Clarion cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 36-8.