Regulatory assessment of the consultation competence of Family Physicians in Hong Kong

Hong Kong Practitioner

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 5-15

  Fraser, R C ^a,b   Lee, R S Y ^b   Yiu, Y K ^b   Lam, C L K ^b   McKinley, R K ^a   Van der Vleuten, C P M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Hong Kong Coll of Family Physicians   (Hong Kong)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consultation competence; Family physicians; Regulatory assessment; Reliability and validity

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HONG KONG; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TRAINING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2942687151     PISSN: 10273948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Spence J. The need for understanding the individual as part of the training and function of doctors and nurses. In: National Association for Mental Health, Ed. The Purpose and Practice of Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1960;271-280.
2. Hager P, Gonczi A, Athanasou J. General issues about assessment of competence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 1994;19:3-15.
3. Fraser RC, McKinley RK, Mulholland H. Assessment of consultation competence in general practice: the Leicester Assessment Package. In: Harden RM, Hart IR, Mulholland H, (eds). In: Approaches to the Assessment of Clinical Competence. Part 1. Dundee: Centre for Medical Education, 1992; 192-198.
4. Fraser RC. Assessment of Consultation Competence. The Leicester Assessment Package. 2nd edition. Glaxo Medical Fellowship, Macclesfield, 1994.
5. Crossley J, Davies H, Humphris G, et al. Generalisability: a key to unlock professional assessment. Med Educ 2002;36:972-978.
6. Ram P, Grol R, Rethans JJ, et al. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ 1999;33:447-454.
7. Van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education 1996;1:41-67.
8. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002;287(2):226-235.
9. Fraser RC, McKinley RK, Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: establishing the face validity of prioritised criteria in the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44:109-113.
10. Fraser RC. Consultation strengths and weaknesses of Hong Kong family physicians: an external view. HK Pract 1999;21:561-562.
11. Lau J, Fraser RC, Lam CLK. Establishing the content validity in Hong Kong of the prioritised criteria of consultation competence in the Leicester Assessment Package. HK Pract 2003;25:596-602.
12. Campbell LM, Howie JGR, Murray TS. Use of videotaped consultations in summative assessment of trainees in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45:137-141.
13. Norcini J. The death of the long case? BMJ 2002;324:408-409.
14. Caulford PG, Lamb SB, Kaigas TB, et al. Physician incompetence: specific problems and predictors. Acad Med 1994;69Suppl(10):16-18.
15. Gleeson F. AMEE Medical Education Guide No 9. Assessment of clinical competence using the Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER). Med Teacher 1997;19:1:7-14.
16. Gleeson F. Personal communication. 1994.
17. Kane MT. The assessment of professional competence. Evaluation and the Health Professions 1992;15:163-182.