Data quality issues in electronic health records: An adaptation framework for the Greek health system

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-36

  Orfanidis, Leonidas ^a   Bamidis, Panagiotis D ^a   Eaglestone, Barry ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data quality; EHR framework; Electronic health records; Greece; Intelligent interfaces; Mobile technology; Patient access

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FACTUAL DATABASE; GREECE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; QUALITY CONTROL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2942684887     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458204040665     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Department of Health. Information for Health: An Information Strategy for the Modern NHS 1998-2005, 1998. http://www.doh.gov.uk, July 2002.
2. Greek Ministry of Health and Welfare. Project for the Development of Health/Welfare Information Science. 2001. http://www.ypyp.gr, March 2003.
3. Norris A. Current trends and challenges in health informatics. In iSHIMR 2002: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Health Information Management Research, Sheffield, 2002 2-15.
4. Jeselon P, Schloeffel P. ISO/TC 215 Ad Hoc Group report: standards requirements for the electronic health record and discharge/referral plans. 2002. http://www.gpcg.org, October 2002.
5. Boaden R, Munir S. Patient empowerment and the electronic health record. In MEDINFO 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 663-5. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
6. Quinlan F. Response to a national approach to electronic health records for Australia: General Practice Computing Group. 2000. http://www.gpcg.org, September 2002.
7. Sherman G. Toward electronic health records. Office of Health and Information Highway Health Canada, 2001. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca, September 2002.
8. NHS Information Authority. ERDIP Evaluation N6, Product P1: technical options for the implementation of electronic health records nationally. 2001. http://www.nhsia.nhs.uk, November 2002.
9. Cohen S, Shabo A. Electronic health record (EHR) standards survey. 2001. http://www.haifa.il.ibm.com, March 2003.
10. Kalra D. Draft initial report version 0.4 of Task Force EHRCOM. Revision of ENV 13606: Electronic Health Record Communication, 2002. http://www.centc251.org, March 2003.
11. Tessier C, Waegemann P. Healthcare documentation: a report on information capture and report generation. 2002. http://www.medrecinst.com, November 2002.
12. Military Health Systems. Data quality: mission needs statement for Data Quality Integrated Program Team (IPT). 1998. http://www.tricare.osd.mil, March 2003.
13. Firth C, Storey V, Wang R. A framework for analysis of data quality research. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 1995; 7 (4); 623-40. http://web.mit.edu, March 2003.
14. National Health Service. NHS update: archive. http://www.nhs.uk, September 2002.
15. Brown P, Sonksen P. Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002 340-51.
16. D'Onofrio M, Gendron M. Data quality in the healthcare industry. Journal of Data Quality 2001; 7 (1). http://www.dataquality.com, August 2002.
17. Boyle D, Cunningham S. Resolving fundamental quality issues in linked datasets for clinical care. Health Informatics Journal 2002; 8 (2); 73-7.
18. Mandl K, Porter S. Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry. In American Medical Informatics Association Three Year Cumulative Symposium Proceedings 1999, 1998, 1997. CD-ROM, AMIA, 1999.
19. Arts D, Keizer N, Jonge E. Data quality measurement and assurance in medical registries. In MEDINFO 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 404. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
20. Long J, Richards J, Seko C. The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Data Quality Framework, Version 1. A Meta-Evaluation and Future Directions. Canadian Institute for Health Information, 2002. http://secure.cihi.ca, April 2003.
21. Eppler M, Wittig D. Conceptualizing information quality: a review of information quality frameworks from the last ten years. In Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Information Quality 83-91. 2000.
22. Crownower A, Rosenbaum S. Designing user interfaces to maximize user acceptance of clinical information systems. 1998. http://www.diamondbullet.com, February 2002.
23. Lieberman H. Introduction to intelligent interfaces. 1997. http://web.media.mit.edu, October 2002.
24. Simkus R. Application of an intelligent graphical interface to electronic patient records. In MEDINFO 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 690-2. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
25. Scott N. Information Impacts Magazine. 2001. http://www.cisp.org, October 2001.
26. Geissbuhler A, Tschopp M. Use of handheld computers as bedside information providers. In MEDINFO 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 764-7. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
27. Ammenwerth E, Bludau B, Buchauer A, Haux R. Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2001 338-57.
28. Marsh A. E-Care project aims to generate wireless 3G medical services enhancing outpatients' mobility. Virtual Medical Worlds 2002. http://www.hoise.com, June 2002.
29. Cheung N, Chow Y, Fung V, Tung Y. Structured data entry of clinical information for documentation and data collection. In MEDINFO 2001. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 609-13. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
30. Brumec V, Habjanic A, Kokol P, Nicklin L, Procter P, Turk D. Intelligent systems for nursing education. In MEDINFO 2001: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Medical Informatics, Amsterdam 1047-50. London: IOS Press, IMIA, 2001.
31. Gil Y, Kim J. User studies of an interdependency-based interface for acquiring problem-solving knowledge. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interface, Louisiana. 2000.
32. Alcock C, Drury M, Fitzpatrick R, Harcourt J, Jones L, Minton M, Yudkin P. Patient with cancer holding their own records: a randomised controlled trial. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2002 352-7.