AAPL and sociopolitical policy

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 184-187

  O'Shaughnessy, Roy J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; LAW; MEDICAL SOCIETY; POLICY; POLITICS; PUNISHMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES;

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW; DEATH AND EUTHANASIA; WAR AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES;

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; POLITICS; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIAL VALUES; SOCIETIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942678735     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (6)

1. The American Psychiatric Association: Moratorium on Capital Punishment in the United States, Position Statement of The American Psychiatric Association. APA Document Reference No. 200006. Washington, DC: Author, 2000
2. The American Psychiatric Association: Medical Participation in Capital Punishment, Position Statement of The American Psychiatric Association. APA Reference No. 800002. Washington, DC: Author, 1980
3. The American Medical Association: A Declaration of Professional Responsibility. Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs No. 123, Washington DC: Author, 2001
4. The American Psychiatric Association. Declaration of Professional Responsibility: Medicine's Social Contract with Humanity, Endorsement by The American Psychiatric Association. APA Document Reference No. 200208. Washington, DC: Author, 2002
5. The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Death Penalty: position statement of AAPL. Bloomfield, CT: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2001. Available at http://aapl.org/positions.htm
6. Appelbaum P: A theory of ethics for forensic psychiatry. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, 25:153-62, 1997