Risk, well-being, and paramountcy in child protection: The need for transformation

Child and Youth Care Forum

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 233-255

  Anglin, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Child protection; Child welfare; Children's best interests; Children's well being; Risk assessment; Risk management; Social service transformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942670461     PISSN: 10531890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016303309618     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Armitage, A. (1998). Lost vision: Children and the Ministry for Children and Families. B.C. Studies, 118, 93-122.
2. Bala, N. & Clarke, K.L. (1981). The child and the law. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
4. Bellefeuille, G., Garrioch, S. & Ricks, F. (1997). Breaking the rules: Transforming governance in social services. Thompson, Manitoba: Awasis Agency of Northern Manitoba.
5. British Columbia. (1992a). Making changes. Report of the Community Panel, Family and Child Services Legislative Review. Victoria. Ministry of Social Services.
6. British Columbia. (1992b). An introduction to the child protection risk management model. Victoria: Ministry for Children and Families.
7. British Columbia. (1992c). The risk assessment model for child protection in British Columbia. Victoria: Ministry for Children and Families.
8. British Columbia. (1995). The child, family and community services act. Victoria: Queen's Printer.
9. British Columbia Children's Commission. (1998). Annual report. Victoria: Queen's Printer.
10. Dartington Social Research Unit. (1995). Child protection: Messages from research. London: HMSO.
11. Farmer, E. and Owen, M. (1995). Child protection practice: Private risks and public remedies. London: HMSO.
12. Gibbons, J. (1997). Relating outcomes to objectives in child protection policy. In Parton, N. (Ed.) (1997). Child protection and family support: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities. London: Routledge.
13. Goldstein, J., Freud, A. and Solnit, A.J. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.
14. Goldstein, J., Freud, A. and Solnit, A.J. (1979). Before the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.
15. Gove, T. J. (1995). Report of the Gove inquiry into child protection: Final report, Vol. 1: Mathew's story, Vol. 2: Mathew's legacy, Executive Summary. Victoria: Queen's Printer.
16. King, M. and Piper, C. (1995). How the law thinks about children. (2nd ed.) Aldershot: Arena.
17. Kline, M. (1992). Child welfare law, "best interests of the child" ideology, and First Nations. Osgoode Law Journal, 20, 2, 237-425.
18. Parton, N. (Ed.) (1997). Child protection and family support: Tensions, contradictions and possibilities. London: Routledge.
19. Parton, N., Thorpe, D. and Wattam, C. (1997). Child protection: Risk and the moral order. London: Macmillan.
20. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
21. Snow, K. and Finlay, J. (1998). Voices from within: Youth speak out. Toronto: Office of the Child and Family Service Advocacy.
22. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Geneva: General Assembly of the United Nations.