Resuscitation of the extremely preterm infant: A perspective from the social model of disability

Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 114-120

  Savage, Teresa A ^a   Kavanaugh, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILDBIRTH; DISABILITY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MODEL; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PARENT; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; RELIABILITY; RESUSCITATION; SOCIAL ASPECT; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2942670191     PISSN: 15273369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.nainr.2004.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Martin J.A. Hamilton B.E. Sutton P.D. et al. Births: Final data for 2002 Natl Vital Stat Rep 52 2003 1-116
2. Meadow W. Lantos J. Epidemiology and ethics in the neonatal intensive care unit Quality Management in Health Care 7 1999 21-31
3. Meadow W. Lantos J.D. Mokalla M. et al. Distributive justice across generations: Epidemiology of ICU care for the very young and very old Clin Perinatol 23 1996 597-608
4. Brown K.J. Kilbride H.W. Turnbull W. et al. Functional outcome at adolescence for infants less than 801 g birth weight: Perceptions of children and parents J Perinatol 23 2003 41-47
5. Perrott S. Dodds L. Vincer M. A population-based study of prognostic factors related to major disability in very preterm survivors J Perinatol 23 2003 111-116
6. Wood N.S. Marlow N. Costeloe K. et al. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth N Engl J Med 343 2000 378-384
7. Asch A. Disability, bioethics and human rights in Albrecht G.L. Seelman K.D. Bury M. (Eds.), Handbook of Disabilities Studies 2001 297-326 SageThousand Oaks, CA
8. Horbar J.D. Badger G.J. Carpenter J.H. et al. Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991-1999 Pediatrics 110 2002 143-151
9. Vohr B. Wright L. Dusick A.M. et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-1994 Pediatrics 105 2000 1216-1226
10. Stolz J.W. McCormick M.C. Restricting access to neonatal intensive care: Effect on mortality and economic savings Pediatrics 101 1998 344-362
11. Lemons J.A. Bauer C.R. Oh W. et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996 Pediatrics 107 2001 1
12. Gerhart K.A. Koziol-McLain J. Lowenstein S.R. et al. Quality of life following spinal cord injury: Knowledge and attitudes of emergency care provide providers Ann Emerg Med 23 1994 807-812
13. Gething L. Judgements by health professionals of personal characteristics of people with a visible physical disability Soc Sci Med 34 1992 809-815
14. Albrecht G.L. Devlieger P.J. The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds Soc Sci Med 48 1999 577-588
15. Saigal S. Feeny D. Rosebaum P. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence JAMA 276 1996 453-459
16. Harrison H. Making lemonade: A parent's view of "quality of life" studies J Clin Ethics 12 2001 239-250
17. Wall S.N. Partridge J.C. Death in the intensive care nursery: Physician practice of withdrawing and withholding life support Pediatrics 99 1997 64-70
18. Catlin A.J. Physicians' perceptions of the dilemma of neonatal resuscitation for extremely low birth weight preterm infants 1998 Rush University, doctoral dissertation Chicago
19. Kavanaugh k. Savage T. Kilpatrick S. et al. Life support decisions for extremely premature infants: Report of a pilot study 2003 Manuscript under review
20. Robinson W.M. Special concerns for infants and children, The Transition from Cure to Comfort (ed): Managing Death in the Intensive Care Unit 2001 337-347 Oxford University PressNew York, NY
21. Hack M. Friedman H. Fanaroff A.A. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants Pediatrics 98 1996 931-937
22. Kilpatrick S. Schleuter M. Piecuch R. et al. Outcome of infants born at 24-26 weeks' gestation: Survival and cost Obstet Gynecol 90 1997 803-808
23. Muraskas J. Marshall P.A. Tomich P. et al. Neonatal viability in the 1990s: Held hostage by technology Camb Q Healthcare Ethics 8 1999 160-172
24. Goldsmith J.P. Ginsberg H.G. McGettigan M.C. Ethical decisions in the delivery room Clin Perinatol 23 1996 529-550
25. Tyson J. Evidence-based ethics and the care of premature infants Future Child 5 1995 197-213
26. Ballard J.L. Khoury J.C. Wedig K. et al. New Ballard score, expanded to include extremely premature infants J Pediatr 119 1991 417-423
27. Kraybill E.N. Ethical issues in the care of the extremely low birth weight infants Semin Perinatol 22 1998 207-215
28. Pinch W.J. When the Bough Breaks: Parental Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making in NICU 2002 University Press of America Lanham, NY
29. Kavanaugh K. The parental experience surrounding the death of a live-born infant weighing less than 500 grams at birth JOGNN/NAACOG 26 1997 43-51
30. Becker P. Grunwald P. Contextual dynamics of ethical decision making in the NICU JPPN 14 2000 58-72
31. McHaffie H.E. Laing I.A. Parker M. et al. Deciding for imperiled newborns: Medical authority or parental autonomy? J Med Ethics 27 2001 104-109
32. Gross M.L. Abortion and neonaticide: Ethics, practice and policy in four nations Bioethics 16 2002 202-230
33. Scholmann P. Fister S. Parental perspectives related to decision-making and neonatal death Pediatr Nurs 21 1995 243-253
34. Miller, Sidney Ainsley v. HCA, Inc. (Hospital Corporation of America and Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corporation). Texas Supreme Court, Case no. 01-0079, opinion rendered September 30, 2003. Accessed December 1, 2003. URL: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/ texasstatecases/sc/010079p.pdf
35. Wocial L.D. Life support decisions involving imperiled infants JPPN 14 2000 73-86
36. Marteau T.M. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients Br J Soc Psychol 23 1989 89-94
37. Robinson A. Bender G.B. Linden M.G. Decisions following the intrauterine diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy Am J Med Genet 34 1989 552-554
38. American Academy of Pediatrics Perinatal care at the threshold of viability Pediatrics 110 2002 1024-1027
39. Nerney T. This is freedom 2000 White paper delivered at American Association on Mental Retardation 124th Annual Meeting, June 2, Washington, DC. Accessed December 4, 2003. URL: www.aamr.org/Readingom/pdf/nerneyitepaper.pdf