Impact of in-depth interviews on the interviewer: Roller coaster ride

Nursing and Health Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-147

  Beale, Barbara ^a   Cole, Rose ^b   Hillege, Sharon ^c   McMaster, Rose ^d   Nagy, Sue ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Penrith Streetwork Project Inc   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Emotional reactions; In depth interviewing; Qualitative research; Research assistant; Research relationships

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EATING DISORDER; EMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LIFE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MODEL; PARENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BURNOUT, PROFESSIONAL; CHILD; EATING DISORDERS; EMOTIONS; EMPATHY; FACULTY, NURSING; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MODELS, NURSING; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEW SOUTH WALES; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PARENTS; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 2942665651     PISSN: 14410745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2004.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alexander J, de Chesnay M, Marshall E, Campbell A, Johnson S, Wright R. Research note: parallel reactions in rape victims and rape researchers. Violence and Victims 1989; 4: 57-62.
2. Beer D. 'There's a certain slant of light': The experience of discovery in qualitative interviewing. Occup. Ther. J. Res. 1997; 17: 110-129.
3. Cowles K. Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. West. J. Nurs. Res. 1988; 10: 163-179.
4. Denning J. Reflexivity and the trustworthiness of qualitative research. JARNA 2000; 3: 21-23.
5. Drew N. The interviewer's experience as data in phenomenological research. West. J. Nurs. Res. 1989; 11: 431-439.
6. Dunn L. Pearls, pith and provocation. Research alert! Qualitative research may be hazardous to your health. Qual. Health Res. 1991; 1: 388-392.
7. Glazer M. The Threat of the Stranger. Hastings Center Report, October 1980; 25-31.
8. Higgins I. Pearls, pith and provocation. Reflections on conducting qualitative research with elderly people. Qual. Health Res. 1998; 8: 858-866.
9. House E. An ethics of qualitative field studies. In: EE Guba (ed). Paradigm Dialogue. California: Sage, 1990; 158-164.
10. Kleinman S, Copp M. Emotions and Fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 28. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993.
11. Koch T, Harrington A. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. J. Adv. Nurs. 1998; 28: 882-890.
12. Lamb G, Huttlinger K. Reflexivity in nursing research. West. J. Nurs. Rev. 1989; 11: 765-772.
13. Minchiello V, Aroni R, Timewell E, Alexander L. In-Depth Interviewing: Prinicples, Techniques, Analysis, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Longman, 1995.
14. Mitchell T, Radford J. Rethinking research relationships in qualitative research. Can J. Commun. Ment. Health 1996; 15: 49-60.
15. Morrell-Bellai TL, Goering PN, Boydell KM. Response to Mitchell and Radford's rethinking research relationships in qualitative research: Further thoughts and suggested training strategies. Can J. Commun. Ment. Health 1997; 16: 127-133.
16. Paterson BL. A framework to identify reactivity in qualitative research. West. J. Nurs. Res. 1994; 16: 301-316.
17. Ramhoj P, de Oliveira E. A phenomenological hermeneutic access to research of the old age area. Experience with application of the qualitative research interview. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 1991; 5:121-127.
18. Ramos M. Some ethical implications of qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health 1989; 12: 57-63.
19. Richards L. Using NVivo in Qualitative Research. Melbourne: Sage Publications, 1999.
20. Rothman B. Reflections: On hard work. Qual. Sociol. 1986; 9: 48-53.
21. Schutz S. Exploring the benefits of a subjective approach in qualitative nursing research. J. Adv. Nurs. 1994; 20: 412-417.
22. Scott D. The researcher's personal responses as a source of insight in the research process. Nurs. Inq. 1996; 4: 130-134.
23. Smith L. Ethical issues in interviewing. J. Adv. Nurs. 1992; 17: 98-103.
24. Sullivan K. Managing the 'sensitive' research interview: a personal account. Nurse Res. 1998; 6: 72-85.
25. Swanson-Kauffmann K. A combined qualitative methodology for nursing research. Adv. Nurs. Sci. 1986; 8: 58-69.
26. Sword W. Pearls, pith, and provocation. Accounting for presence of self: reflections on doing qualitative research. Qual. Health Res. 1999; 9: 270-278.
27. Van Maanen J. Tales of the Field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
28. Webb C. Action research: philosophy, methods and personal experiences. J. Adv. Nurs. 1989; 14: 403-410.
29. Wilde V. Controversial hypotheses on the relationship between researcher and informant in qualitative research. J. Adv. Nurs. 1992; 17: 234-242.
30. Yong V. Interviewing men on sensitive issues. Contemp. Nurse 2001; 11: 18-27.