Molecular similarity and property similarity

Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 589-600

  Barbosa, Frédérique ^a   Horvath, Dragos ^a  

^a CEREP   (France)

Author keywords

Descriptors; Metric; Neighborhood behavior; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITOR; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; PROTEIN FARNESYLTRANSFERASE; PROTEIN FARNESYLTRANSFERASE INHIBITOR; RYANODINE; SEROTONIN AGONIST; STEROID; TROPANE DERIVATIVE; DRUG;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR SIMILARITY INDICES ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG MECHANISM; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG STRUCTURE; DRUG TARGETING; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PHARMACOPHORE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DRUG DESIGN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 2942640607     PISSN: 15680266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1568026043451186     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Maggiora, G.M.; Johnson, M.A. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity. John Wiley & Sons 1990, pp 99-117.
2. Kubiny, H., Structure-Based Design of Enzyme Inhibitors and Receptor Ligands, oral presentation at the Second European Workshop in Drug Design, Certosa di Pontignano, May 17-24, 1998.
3. Patterson, D. E.; Cramer, R. D.; Ferguson, A. M.; Clark, R. D.; Weinberger, L. E. Neighborhood Behavior: A Useful Concept for Validation of "Molecular Diversity" Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3049-3059.
4. Hodgkin, E.E.; Richards, W.G. Molecular Similarity Based on Electrostatic Potential and Electric Field. Int. J. Quantum Biol. Symp., 1980, 14, 105-110.
5. Carbo, R.; Domingo, L. LCAO-MO Similarity Measures and Taxonomy. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 1987, 32, 517-545.
6. Carbo, R.; Leyda, L.; Arnau, M. An Electron Density Measure of the Similarity between Two Compounds. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 1980, 17, 1185-1189.
7. Brown, R.D. Descriptors for Diversity Analysis. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 1997, 7/8, 31-49.
8. Good, A.C.; Richards, W.G. Explicit Calculation of 3D Molecular Similarity. Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 1998, 9/10/11, 321-338.
9. Clark, R.D. Relative and Absolute Diversity Analysis of Combinatorial Libraries in Combinatorial Library Design and Evaluation: Principles, Software Tools and Applications; Ghose, A.; Viswanadhan,V.; Eds., Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001, pp. 337-362.
10. Chen, X.; Rusinkon, A.; Young, S.S. Recursive Partitioning Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1998, 38, 1054-1062.
11. Balaban, A.T. Highly Discriminating Distance-Based Topological Index. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 89, 399-404.
12. Balaban, A.T.; Ivanciuc, O. Fortran 77 Computer Program for Calculating the Topological Index J for Molecules Containing Heteroatoms. In Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry; Graovac, A.; Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1989, 63, pp 193-211.
13. Wiener, H. Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points. J. Chem. Phys. 1947, 69, 17-20.
14. Hall, L.H.; Kier, L.B. The Molecular Connectivity Chi Indexes and Kappa Shape Indexes in Structure-Property Modeling. In Reviews in Computational Chemistry II, Lipkowitz, K.B.; Boyd, D.B.; Eds.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1991, pp 367-422.
15. Hall, L.H.; Kier, L.B. Electrotopological State Indces for Atom Types: A Novel Combination of Electronic, Topologic and Valence State Information. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1995, 35, 1039-1045.
16. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C.; Tolan, J. W.; Muskal, S. M. Prediction of Human Intestinal Absorption of Drug Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 726-735.
17. Glen, W.G.; Dunn, W.J.; Scott, D.R. Principal Components Analysis and Partial Least Squares Regressions. Tetrahedron Comput. Technol. 1989, 2, 349-376.
18. Burden, F.R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.
19. Pearlman, R.S. Novel Software Tools for Addressing Chemical Diversity. Network Science 1996, http://www.netsci.org/Science/Combichem/feature08.html
20. Pickett, S.D.; Mason, J.S.; McLay, I.M. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1996, 36, 1214-1223.
21. Mason, J.S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P.R.; Cheney, D.L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R.F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 38, 144-150.
22. Horvath, D. High Throughput Conformational Sampling & Fuzzy Similarity Metrics: A Novel Approach to Similarity Searching and Focused Combinatorial Library Design and its Role in the Drug Discovery Laboratory. In Combinatorial Library Design and Evaluation: Principles, Software Tools and Applications; Ghose, A.; Viswanadhan,V.; Eds.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 2001; pp 429-472.
23. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996.
24. Menard, J.P.; Mason, J.S.; Morize, I.; Bauerschmidt, S. Chemistry Space Metrics in Diversity Analysis, Library Design, and Compound Selection J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1204-1213.
25. Cramer, R.D.; Poss, M.A.; Hermsmeier, M.A.; Caulfield, T.J.; Kowala, M.C.; Valentine, M.T. Prospective Identification of Biologically Active Structures by Topomer Shape Similarity Searching. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3919-3933.
26. Cramer, R.D.; Jilek, R.J.; Andrews, K.M. dbtop: Topomer Similarity Searching of Conventional Structure Databases. J. Mol. Graphics Modelling 2002, 20, 447-462.
27. Stanton, D. T.; Morris, T. W.; Roychoudhury, S.; Parker, C. N. Application of Nearest-Neighbor and Cluster Analyses in Pharmaceutical Lead Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 21-27.
28. Dixon, S.L.; Metz, K.M. Jr. One-Dimensional Molecular Representations and Similarity Calculations: Methodology and Validation. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3795-3809.
29. Matter, H. Selecting Optimally Diverse Compounds from Structure Databases: A Validation Study of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Molecular Descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1219-1229.
30. Sheridan, R.P.; Nachbar, R.B.; Bush, B.L. Extending the Trend Vector: The Trend Matrix and Sample-Based Partial Least Squares. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 323-340.
31. Todeschini, R.; Lasagni, M.; Marengo, E. New Molecular Descriptors for 2D and 3D Structures. Theory. J. Chemom. 1994, 8, 263-272.
32. Martin, Y.C.; Kofron, J.L.; Traphagen, L.M. Do Structurally Similar Molecules Have Similar Biological Activity? J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 4350-4358.
33. Matter, H.; Pötter, T. Random or Rational Design? Evaluation of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Databases. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 478-488.
34. Pearlman, R.S.; Smith, K. Metric Validation and the Receptor-Relevant Subspace Concept. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 28-35.
35. Horvath, D.; Jeandenans, C. Neighborhood Behavior of In Silico Structural Spaces with respect to In Vitro Activity Spaces - A Novel Understanding of the Molecular Similarity Principle in the Context of Multiple Receptor Binding Profiles. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 680-690.
36. Horvath, D.; Jeandenans, C. Neighborhood Behavior of In Silico Structural Spaces with respect to In Vitro Activity Spaces - A Benchmark for Neighborhood Behavior Assessment of Different In Silico Similarity Metrics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 691-698.
37. Matter, H.; Pötter, T. Comparing 3D Pharmacophore Triplets and 2D Fingerprints for Selecting Diverse compound Subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1211-1225.
38. Makara, M.G. Measuring Molecular Similarity and Diversity: Total Pharmacophore Diversity. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3563-3571.
39. Stouch, T.R.; Jurs, P.C. Computer-Aided Studies of the Structure-Activity Relationships between the Structure of Some Steroids and their Antiinflammatory Activity. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 2125-2136.
40. Hoffman, B.; Cho, S.J.; Zheng, W.; Wyrick, S.; Nichols, D.E.; Mailman, R.B.; Tropsha, A. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling of Dopamine D1 Antagonists Using Comparative Molecular Field Analysis, Genetic Algorithms-Partial Least Squares, and K-Nearest Neighbor Methods. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3217-3226.
41. Stanton, D. T.; Morris, T. W.; Roychoudhury, S.; Parker, C. N. Application of Nearest-Neighbor and Cluster Analyses in Pharmaceutical Lead Dicsovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 21-27.
42. Miller, D.W. Results of a New Classification Algorithm Combining K Nearest Neighbors and Recursive Partitioning. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 168-175.
43. Zheng, W.; Tropsha, A. Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Porperty Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest Neighbor Principle. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194.
44. Olsson, T.; Oprea, T.I. Cheminformatics: a tool for decision-makers in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2001, 4, 308-13.
45. Oprea, T.I. Chemical Space Navigation in Lead Discovery, Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2002, 6, 384-389.
46. Oprea, T.I.; Gottfires, J. Chemography: The Art of Navigating in Chemical Space. J.Comb.Chem. 2001, 3, 157-166.
47. Oprea, TI.; Zamora, I.; Ungell, AL. Pharmacokinetically Based Mapping Device for Chemical Space Navigation. J. Comb. Chem. 2002, 4, 258-266.
48. VolSurf is a product of Molecular Discovery Limited, http://www.moldiscovery.com.
49. Beck-Sickinger, A. G. Structural characterization and binding sites of G-protein-coupled receptors. DDT 1996, 1, 502-513.
50. James, C.A.; Weiniger, D.; Delaney, J. Fingerprints-Screening and Similarity. Daylight Theory Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc. 1997, http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.toc.html.
51. Unity Chemical Information Software, version 2.5, Reference Guide pp 45-58; Tripos Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Rd, St. Louis, MO 63144.
52. Cerep Online Catalog; http://www.cerep.com/.
53. Poulain, R.; Horvath, D.; Bonnet, B.; Eckoff, C.; Chapelain, B.; Bodinier, M-C.; Déprez, B. From Hit to Lead. Combining Two Complementary Methods for Focused Library Design Application to μ Opiate Ligands. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3378-3390.
54. Poulain, R.; Horvath, D.; Bonnet, B.; Eckoff, C.; Chapelain, B.; Bodinier, M-C.; Déprez, B. From Hit to Lead. Analyzing Structure-Profile Relationships; J. Med. Chem., 2001, 44, 3391-3401.
55. Klebe, G., Structural Alignment of Molecules, in "3D-QSAR in Drug Design", Kubinyi, H, Ed. ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, 173-199
56. Cramer, R.D. III; Patterson D.E.; Bunce, J.E.; Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
57. Horvath, D. ComPharm - Automated Comparative Analysis of Pharmacophoric Patterns and Derived QSAR Approaches, Novel Tools in High Throughput Drug Discovery. A Proof of Concept Study Applied to Farnesyl Protein Transferase Inhibitor Design, pp. 395-439; in "QSPR / QSAR Studies by Molecular Descriptors", Diudea, M., Editor, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York 2001.
58. Kaminski, J.J.; Rane, D.F.; Snow, M.E.; Weber, L.; Rothofsky, M.L.; Anderson, S.D.; Lin, S.L.; Identification of Novel Farnesyl-Protein Transferase Inhibitors Using Three-Dimensional Database Searching Methods, J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 4103-4112.