Environmental performance indices, family types and consumption patterns

Advances in Ecological Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue , 2003, Pages 657-667

  Wier, M ^a   Munksgaard, J ^a   Christoffersen, L B ^a   Jensen, T S ^b   Pedersen, O G ^c   Keiding, H ^d   Lenzen, M ^e  

^a DANISH INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH   (Denmark)

^b D   (Denmark)

^c Statistics Denmark ^*  (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; DEGRADATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GLOBAL WARMING; IMPURITIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CONSUMPTION PATTERNS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); ENERGY FLOW MATRICES; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICES;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

EID: 2942637929     PISSN: 13698273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Munksgaard, J. & Smed, S. Environmental effects of household consumption pattern and lifestyle. Economic Systems Research, 13, pp. 259-274, 2001.
2. 2 reduction. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15, pp. 146-158, 2001.
3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. & Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of desision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429-444, 1978.
4. Taskin, F. & Zaim, O. Searching for a Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency using kernel estimation. Economics Letters, 68, pp. 217-223, 2000.
5. Taskin, F. & Zaim, O. The role of international trade on environmental efficiency: a DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 18, pp. 1-17, 2001.
6. 2 emissions from OECD industries. Ressource and Energy Economics, 23, pp. 63-83, 2001.
7. Sarkis, J. A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 36, pp. 793-810, 1999.
8. Sarkis, J. & Weinrach, J. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious waste treatment technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, pp. 417-427, 2001.
9. Bevilacqua, M. & Braglia, M. Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, pp. 85-92, 2002.
10. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. & Tyteca, D., An activity analysis model of the environmental performance of firms - application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics, 18, pp. 161-175, 1996.
11. Hailu, A. & Veeman, T.S., Alternative methods for environmentally adjusted productivity analysis. Agricultural Economics, 25, pp. 211-218, 2001.
12. Jung, E.J., Kim, J.S. & Rhee, S.K. The measurement of corporate environmental performance and its application to the analysis of efficiency in oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, pp. 551-563, 2001.
13. Lovell, C.A.K., Pastor, J.T. & Turner, J.A. Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 87, pp. 507-518, 1995.
14. Sarkis, J. & Cordeiro, J.J. An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, pp. 102-113, 2001.
15. Dyckhoff, H. &; Allen, K. Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132, pp. 312-325, 2001.
16. Reinhard, S., Lovell, C.A.K. & Thijssen, G.J. Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121, pp. 287-303, 2000.