An ontology-based software agent system case study

Proceedings ITCC 2003, International Conference on Information Technology: Computers and Communications

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 500-506

  Sheldon, F T ^a,b   Elmore, M T ^a   Potok, T E ^a  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MS 6363 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; ONTOLOGY;

AGENT APPROACH; DATA-SOURCES; DYNAMIC APPROACHES; HETEROGENEOUS SOURCES; KNOWLEDGE-SHARING; LABORATORY DATUM; NATIONAL LABORATORY; ONTOLOGY-BASED;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 2942630107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITCC.2003.1197580     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Chandrasekaran, B., J.R. Josephson, and V.R. Benjamin, What are Ontologies and Why Do We Need Them? Intelligent Systems, 1999. 14(1): p. 20-26.
2. Gruber, T., A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993. 5(2): p. 199-220.
3. Klusch, M., Information Agent Technology for the Internet: A Survey. Journal on Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2001. 36(3).
4. Kashyap, V. and A. Sheth, eds. Semantic heterogeneity in global information systems: the role of metadata context and ontology. Cooperative INformation Systems: Trends and Directions, ed. M.P. Papazoglou and G. Schlageter. 1998, Academic Press, New York.
5. WordNet, A lexical database for English. 2001, http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/.
6. Fowler, M., UML Distilled: Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language. 1997: Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
7. W3C-Recommendation, Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 1996-2003 (c). 1998, World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/XML.
8. W3C, RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. 2003 (c), World Wide Web Consortium http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
9. Buchheit, M., et al., A refined architecture for terminological systems: terminology = schemas + views. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 1998. 99(2).
10. Donini, F.M., et al., The complexity of concept languages. Information and Computation, 1997. 134(1).
11. Holsapple, C.W. and K.D. Joshi, A Collaborative Approach to Ontology Design. Communications of the ACM, 2002. 35: p. 42-47.
12. Potok, T.E., M.T. Elmore, and N. Ivezic. Collaborative Management Environment. in InForum. 1999. Washington DC: Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) - www.osti.gov and Department of Energy (DOE) - www.energy.gov.