Large-scale factors associated with sicklefin chub distribution in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 133, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 577-587

  Dieterman, Douglas J ^a,b   Galat, David L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; RIVER FLOW; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

MISSOURI RIVER; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; YELLOWSTONE RIVER;

LEUCISCUS CEPHALUS; MACRHYBOPSIS; MACRHYBOPSIS MEEKI; PISCES;

EID: 2942626023     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T03-002.1     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allen, T. F. H., and T. W. Hoekstra. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.
2. Benke, A. C. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9:77-88.
3. Berry, C. R., and B. A. Young. 2001. Introduction to the benthic fishes study, volume 1. Population structure and habitat use of benthic fishes along the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers. U.S. Geological Survey, Cooperative Research Units, South Dakota State University, Brookings. Available: http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/pd-e/ benthic_fish/benthic_fish.htm. (August 2001).
4. Bonner, T. H., and G. R. Wilde. 2000. Changes in the Canadian River fish assemblage associated with reservoir construction. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15:189-198.
5. Bonner, T. H., and G. R. Wilde. 2002. Effects of turbidity on prey consumption by prairie stream fishes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 1203-1208.
6. Bunn, S. E., and A. H. Arthington. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:492-507.
7. Colwell, R. K. 1974. Predictability, constancy, and contingency of periodic phenomena. Ecology 55:1148-1153.
8. Davis, B. J., and R. J. Miller. 1967. Brain patterns in minnows of the genus Hybopsis in relation to feeding habits and habitat. Copeia 1967(1):1-39.
9. Dieterman, D. J. 2000. Spatial patterns in phenotypes and habitat use of sicklefin chub, Macrhybopsis meeki, in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers. Doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia.
10. Dynesius, M., and C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753-762.
11. Fausch, K. D., and K. R. Bestgen. 1997. Ecology of fishes indigenous to the central and southwestern Great Plains. Pages 131-167 in F. L. Knopf and F. B. Samson, editors. Ecology of Great Plains vertebrates and their habitats. Springer-Verlag, New York.
12. Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgersen, V. Baxter, and H. W. Li. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52:483-498.
13. Fisher, S. J. 1999. Seasonal investigation of native fishes and their habitats in Missouri River and Yellowstone River backwaters. Doctoral dissertation. South Dakota State University, Brookings.
14. Galat, D. L., and 16 coauthors. 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. BioScience 48(9):721-733.
15. Galat, D. L., C. R. Berry, W. M. Gardner, J. C. Hendrickson, G. E. Mesil, G. J. Power, C. Stone, and M. R. Winston. In press. Spatiotemporal patterns and changes in Missouri River fishes. In J. Rinne and R. Hughes, editors. Historical changes in large river fish assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
16. Galat, D. L., and R. Lipkin. 2000. Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River. Hydrobiologia 422/423:29-48.
17. Galat, D. L., J. W. Robinson, and L. W. Hesse. 1996. Restoring aquatic resources to the Lower Missouri River: issues and initiatives. Pages 49-71 in D. L. Galat, and A. G. Frazier, editors. Overview of river-floodplain ecology in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
18. Galat, D. L., M. L. Wildhaber, and D. J. Dieterman. 2001. Spatial patterns of physical habitat, volume 2. Population structure and habitat use of benthic fishes along the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers. U.S. Geological Survey, Cooperative Research Units, University of Missouri, Columbia. Available: http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/pde/benthic_fish/benthic_fish.htm. (August 2001).
19. Galat, D. L., and I. Zweimüller. 2001. Conserving large-river fishes: is the highway analogy an appropriate paradigm? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20:266-279.
20. Gelwicks, G. T., L. K. Graham, and D. L. Galat. 1996. Status survey for sicklefin chub, sturgeon chub, and flathead chub in the Missouri River, Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Final Report, Columbia.
21. Grady, J. M., and J. Milligan. 1998. Status of selected cyprinid species at historic Lower Missouri River sampling sites. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbia, Missouri.
22. Griffith, D. A. 1987. Spatial autocorrelation: a primer. Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C.
23. Haines, A. T., B. L. Finlayson, and T. A. McMahon. 1988. A global classification of river regimes. Applied Geography 8:255-272.
24. Hart, D. D., T. E. Johnson, K. L. Bushaw-Newton, R. J. Horwitz, A. T. Bednarek, D. F. Charles, D. A. Kreeger, and D. J. Velinsky. 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience 52:669-681.
25. Hesse, L. W. 1994. The status of Nebraska fishes in the Missouri River, 5. Selected chubs and minnows (Cyprinidae): sicklefin chub (Macrhybopsis meeki), sturgeon chub (M. gelida), silver chub (M. storeriana), speckled chub (M. aestivalis), flathead chub (Platygobio gracilis), plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus), and western silvery minnow (H. argyritis). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 21:99-108.
26. Hesse, L. W., J. C. Schmulbach, J. M. Carr, K. D. Keenlyne, D. G. Unkenholz, J. W. Robinson, and G. E. Mesil. 1989. Missouri river fishery resources in relation to past, present, and future stresses. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:352-371.
27. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6:65-70.
28. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York.
29. Humphries, P., A. J. King, and J. D. Koehn. 1999. Fish, flows, and floodplains: links between freshwater fishes and their environment in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56:129-151.
30. Humphries, P., and P. S. Lake. 2000. Fish larvae and the management of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16:421-432.
31. Johnston, C. E. 1999. The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 55: 21-30.
32. Johnston, C., and L. Page. 1992. The evolution of complex reproductive strategies in North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Pages 600-621 in R. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
33. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659-1673.
34. Legendre, P., and M. J. Fortin. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107-138.
35. Luttrell, G. R., A. E. Echelle, W. L. Fisher, and D. J. Eisenhour. 1999. Declining status of two species of the Macrhybopsis aestivalis complex (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in the Arkansas River basin and related effects of reservoirs as barriers to dispersal. Copeia 1999:981-989.
36. Menard, S. 1995. Applied logistic regression analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
37. Miller, R. R., J. D. Williams, and J. E. Williams. 1989. Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14(6):22-38.
38. Minckley, W. L., P. C. Marsh, J. E. Deacon, T. E. Dowling, P. W. Hedrick, W. J. Matthews, and G. Mueller. 2003. A conservation plan for native fishes of the lower Colorado River. BioScience 53:219-234.
39. Molles, M. C., Jr., C. S. Crawford, L. M. Ellis, H. M. Valett, and C. N. Dahm. 1998. Managed flooding for riparian ecosystem restoration. BioScience 749-756.
40. Moore, G. A. 1950. The cutaneous sense organs of barbeled minnows adapted to life in the muddy waters of the Great Plains region. Transactions of the American Microscopy Association 69(1):69-95.
41. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. 1991. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78: 691-692.
42. National Research Council. 2002. The Missouri River ecosystem: exploring the prospects for recovery. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
43. Natural Heritage Network. 2002. NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life. Available: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/ NatureServe? init=Species. (October 2002).
44. Olden, J. D., D. A. Jackson, and P. R. Peres-Neto. 2002. Predictive models of fish species distributions: a note on proper validation and chance predictions. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 329-336.
45. Patton, T. M., and W. A. Hubert. 1993. Reservoirs on a Great Plains stream affect downstream habitat and fish assemblages. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8: 279-286.
46. Pflieger, W. L. 1997. The fishes of Missouri, revised edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City.
47. Pflieger, W. L., D. Dieterman, and D. Galat. 1999. Identification and verification of Missouri River fishes. Missouri Cooperative Research Unit, University of Missouri, Columbia.
48. Pflieger, W. L., and T. B. Grace. 1987. Changes in the fish fauna of the Lower Missouri River, 1940-1983. Pages 166-177 in W. J. Matthews and D. C. Heins, editors. Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
49. Platania, S. P., and C. S. Altenbach. 1998. Reproductive strategies and egg types of seven Rio Grande Basin cyprinids. Copeia 1998(3):559-569.
50. Pringle, C. M., M. C. Freeman, and B. J. Freeman. 2000. Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: tropical-temperate comparisons. BioScience 50:807-823.
51. Rabeni, C. F. 1996. Prairie legacies; fish and aquatic resources. Pages 111-124 in F. Samson and F. Knopf, editors. Prairie conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
52. Rahel, F. J., R. T. Muth, and C. A. Carlson. 1999. Endangered species management. Pages 431-454 in C. C. Kohler and W. A. Hubert, editors. Inland fisheries management in North America, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
53. Reno, H. W. 1969. Cephalic lateral-line systems of the cyprinid genus Hybopsis. Copeia 1969(4):736-773.
54. Ricciardi, A., and J. B. Rasmussen. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13(5):1220-1222.
55. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
56. Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, J. Powell, and D. P. Braun. 1996. A method for assessing hydrological alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10:1163-1174.
57. Rosenberg, D. M., P. McCully, and C. M. Pringle. 2000. Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations: introduction. BioScience 50:746-751.
58. Sappington, L., D. Dieterman, and D. Galat. 1998. 1998 Standard operating procedures to evaluate population structure and habitat use of benthic fishes along the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers. National Biological Service, Midwest Science Center, Columbia, Missouri. Available: http://infolink.cr.usgs. gov/science/ benthicfish. (August 2001).
59. SAS Institute, Inc. 1995. Logistic regression examples using the SAS system, version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
60. Scheidegger, K. J., and M. B. Bain. 1995. Larval fish distribution and microhabitat use in free-flowing and regulated rivers. Copeia 1995(1):125-135.
61. Schiemer, F., M. Zalewski, and J. E. Thorp. 1995. Land-inland water ecotones: intermediate habitats critical for conservation and management. Hydrobiologia 303:259-264.
62. Schmidt, J. C., R. H. Webb, R. A. Valdez, G. R. Marzolf, and L. E. Stevens. 1998. Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon. BioScience 48: 735-747.
63. Schultz, A. A., O. E. Maughan, S. A. Bonar, and W. J. Matter. 2003. Effects of flooding on abundance of native and nonnative fishes downstream from a small impoundment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23:503-511.
64. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2001. Biological opinion on the operation of the Missouri River mainstem reservoir system, operation and maintenance of the Missouri River bank stabilization and navigation project, and operation of the Kansas River reservoir system. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Denver, Colorado. Available: http:// www.nwd.usace.army.mil. (October 2002).
65. USOFR (U.S. Office of the Federal Register). 2001. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: 12-month finding for a petition to list the sicklefin chub (Macrhybopsis meeki) and the sturgeon chub (Macrhybopsis gelida) as endangered. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 50, Part 17. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
66. Ward, J. V., and J. A. Stanford. 1983. The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. Pages 29-42 in T. D. Fontaine and S. M. Bartell, editors. Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
67. Watson, G., and T. W. Hillman. 1997. Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of bull trout: an investigation at hierarchical scales. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:237-252.
68. Werdon, S. J. 1993. Status report on sicklefin chub (Macrhybopsis meeki), a candidate endangered species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bismarck, North Dakota.