Labeling corrections and aware sites in spoken dialogue systems

Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2001 Workshop - 2nd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages

  Hirschbergy, Julia ^a   Swertsz, Marc ^b,c   Litmany, Diane ^a  

^a AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

^b Institute for Perception Research Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

^c CNTS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE STRATEGY; LABELINGS; OTHER PROPERTIES; PROSODICS; SIMPLE++; SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEM; SYSTEM ERRORS;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 2942622921     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Allen and M. Core. 1997. Dialogue markup in several layers. Draft contribution for the Discourse Resource Initiative.
2. L. Bell and J. Gustafson. 1999. Repetition and its phonetic realizations: Investigating a Swedish database of spontaneous computer-directed speech. In Proceedings of ICPhS-99, San Francisco. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
3. W. Cohen. 1996. Learning trees and rules with set-valued features. In 14th Conference of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI.
4. J. Hirschberg, D. Litman, and M. Swerts. 2000. Generalizing prosodic prediction of speech recognition errors. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing.
5. J. Hirschberg, D. Litman, and M. Swerts. 2001. Identifying user corrections automatically in spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of NAACL-2001, Pittsburgh.
6. C. Kamm, S. Narayanan, D. Dutton, and R. Ritenour. 1997. Evaluating spoken dialogue systems for telecommunication services. In Proc. EUROSPEECH-97, Rhodes.
7. E. Krahmer, M. Swerts, M. Theune, and M. Weegels. 1999. Error spotting in human-machine interactions. In Proceedings of EUROSPEECH-99.
8. E. Krahmer, M. Swerts, M. Theune, and M. Weegels. to appear. The dual of denial: Two uses of disconfirmations in dialogue and their prosodic correlates. Accepted for Speech Communication.
9. G. Levow. 1998. Characterizing and recognizing spoken corrections in human-computer dialogue. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, COLING/ACL 98, pages 736{742.
10. D. Litman, J. Hirschberg, and M. Swerts. 2000. Predicting automatic speech recognition performance using prosodic cues. In Proceedings of NAACL-00, Seattle, May.
11. D. Litman, J. Hirschberg, and M. Swerts. 2001. Predicting User Reactions to System Error. In Proceedings of ACL-01, Toulouse, July.
12. D. Litman and S. Pan. 1999. Empirically evaluating an adaptable spoken dialogue system. In Proceedings tth International conference on User Modeling.
13. S. L. Oviatt, G. Levow, M. MacEarchern, and K. Kuhn. 1996. Modeling hyperarticulate speech during human-computer error resolution. In Proceedings of ICSLP-96, pages 801{804, Philadelphia.
14. A. Shimojima, K. Katagiri, H. Koiso, and M. Swerts. 1999. An experimental study on the informational and grounding functions of prosodic features of Japanese echoic responses. In Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Dialogue and Prosody, pages 187{192, Veldhoven.
15. M. Swerts, D. Litman, and J. Hirschberg. 2000. Corrections in spoken dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing.
16. E. Wade, E. E. Shriberg, and P. J. Price. 1992. User behaviors affecting speech recognition. In Proceedings of ICSLP-92, volume 2, pages 995{998, Banff.