Effect of gait cycle selection on EMG analysis during walking in adults and children with gait pathology

Gait and Posture

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 92-101

  De Stefano, A ^a   Burridge, J H ^b   Yule, V T ^a   Allen, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electromyography (EMG); Footswitches; Gait cycle

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CASE REPORT; CEREBRAL PALSY; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NEUROPATHOLOGY; PHASE TRANSITION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TELEMETRY; TELEVISION CAMERA; WALKING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AUTOMATION; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; GAIT; HUMANS; INFANT; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WALKING;

EID: 2942622328     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00099-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Perry J, Willoughby, CD, editors. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 1992.
2. Benedetti M.G., Bonato P., Catani F., Knaflitz M., Marcacci M., Simoncini L. Myoelectric activation pattern during gait in total knee replacement: relationship with kinematics, kinetics and clinical outcome. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 7:1999;140-149
3. O'Malley M.J., Abel M.F., Damiano D.L., Vaughan C.L. Fuzzy clustering of children with cerebral palsy based on temporal distance gait parameters. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. 5:1997;300-309
4. Sojka A.M., Stuberg W.A., Knutson L.M. Kinematic and electromyographic characteristics of children with cerebral palsy who exhibit genu recurvatum. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 76:1995;558-565
5. Todd F.N., Lomoreux L.W., Skinner S.R., Johanson M.E., Helen R.S., Moran S.A., Ashley R.K. Variation in the gait of normal children. A graph applicable to the documentation of normalities. J. Bone Joint Surg. 71:1989;196-204
6. De Visser E., Mulder T., Schreuder H.W. Gait and electromyographic analysis of patients recovering after limb-saving surgery. Clin. Biomech. 15:2000;592-599
7. Perry J., Bontrager E.L., Bogey R.A. The Rancho EMG analyser: a computerized system for gait analysis. J. Biomed. Eng. 15:1993;487-496
8. Perry J., Bontrager E.L., Bogey R.A. The Rancho EMG analyser: a computerized system for gait analysis. J. Biomed. Eng. 15:1993;751-756
9. De Vita P. Selection of a standard convention for analysing gait data based on the analysis of relevant biomechanical factors. J. Biomech. 27:1994;501-508
10. Bogey R.A., Barnes L.A., Perry J. Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject EMG profiles during gait. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 73:1992;835-841
11. Prilutsky B.I., Gregor R.J., Ryan M.M. Coordination of two joint rectus femoris and hamstrings during the swing phase of human walking and running. Exp. Brain Res. 120:1998;479-486
12. Ghoussayni S, Stevens C, Durham S, Ewins D. Events gait detection: a comparison of force platform, visual inspection, and kinematic algorithm based methods. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Gait and Clinical Movement Analysis Society Meeting. Chattanooga, Tennessee, 2002.
13. Wall J.C., Crosbie J. Accuracy and reliability of temporal gait measurement. Gait Posture. 4:1996;293-296
14. Hansen A.H., Childress D.S. A simple method for the determination of gait events. J. Biomech. 35:2002;135-138
15. Hreljac A., Marshall R.N. Algorithms to determine event timing during normal walking using kinematic data. J. Biomech. 33:2000;783-786
16. Mickelborough J., van der Linden M.L. Validity and reliability of a kinematic protocol for determining foot contact events. Gait Posture. 11:2000;22-37
17. Stanhope S.J., Kepple T.M., McGuire D.A., Roman N.L. Kinematic based technique for event time determination during gait. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 28:1990;355-360
18. Sutherland DH, Olsen RA, Biden EM, Wyatt MP. The development of mature walking. London: MacKeith Press; 1988.
19. O'Keefe C. Muscle activation patterns in the trans tibial amputee. Melbourne: Monach Rehabilitation Technology Research Unit Report, Monach Australia's International University; 2000.
20. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Hägg GG, Stegeman D, Blok J, et al. European recommendations for surface electromyography, deliverable of the SENIAM project, Roessingh Research and Development b.v., 1999.
21. Hogan N, Mann RW. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography part 1: derivation of the optimal myoprocessor, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980; BME-27: 382-395.
22. D'Alessio T., Analysis of digital EMG signal processor in Dynamic Conditions, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; BME-32: 78-82.
23. Parker P.A., Stuller J.A., Scott R.N. Signal processing for multistate myoelectric channel. Proc. IEEE. 65:1977;662-673
24. Rabiner LR, Schafer RW. Digital processing of speech signals. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1978.
25. Shiavi R., Frigo C., Pedotti A. Electromyographic signals during gait: criteria for envelope filtering and number of strides. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 36:1998;171-178