Modified translabyrinthine approach and hearing preservation

Laryngoscope

Volumn 114, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1133-1138

  Magliulo, Giuseppe ^a,b   Parrotto, Donato ^a   Stasolla, Alessandro ^a   Marini, Mario ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hearing preservation; Modified translabyrinthine approach; Partial labyrinthectomy; Translabyrinthine approach; Vestibular schwannoma

Indexed keywords

BONE WAX;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GARDNER ROBERTSON SCALE; HEARING; HUMAN; INTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL; LABYRINTHECTOMY; MALE; MENIERE DISEASE; MODIFIED TRANSLABYRINTHINE APPROACH; NEURILEMOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TINNITUS; TUMOR VOLUME; VESTIBULAR DISORDER; VESTIBULE;

ADULT; EAR, INNER; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEUROMA, ACOUSTIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2942620296     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200406000-00034     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McElveen JT, Wilkins RH, Erwin AC, Wolford RD. Modifying the translabyrinthine approach to preserve hearing during acoustic tumor surgery. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:34-37.
2. Molony TB, Kwartler JA, House WF, Hitselberger WE. Extended middle fossa and retrolabyrinthine approaches in acoustic neuroma surgery: case reports. Am J Otol 1992;13:360-363.
3. Hirsch BE, Cass SP, Sekhar LN, Wright DC. Translabyrinthine approach to skull base tumors with hearing preservation. Am J Otol 1993;14:533-543.
4. Arriaga M, Gorum MM. Enhanced retrosigmoid exposure with posterior semicircular canal resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;115:46-48.
5. Gormley WB, Sekhar LN, Wright DC, et al. Acoustic neuromas: results of current surgical management. Neurosurgery 1997;41:50-60.
6. Sekhar LN, Schessel DA, Bocur SD, et al. Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to neoplastic and vascular lesions of the petroclival area. Neurosurgery 1999;44:537-552.
7. Horgan MA, Delashaw JB, Schwartz MS, Kellogg JX, Spektor S, McMenomey SO. Transcrusal approach to the petroclival region with hearing preservation. J Neurosurg 2001;94:660-666.
8. Magliulo G. Modified retrolabyrinthine approach with partial labyrinthectomy: anatomic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:287-291.
9. Magliulo G, Varacalli S, D'Amico R, Zardo F. Retrosigmoid approach combined with partial labyrinthectomy and hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. In: Filipo R, Barbara M, eds. Acoustic Neuroma: Trends And Controversies. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler; 1999:137-144.
10. Bento RF, de Brito RV, Sanchez TG, Miniti A. The transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:437-441.
11. Tos M, Thomsen Jed. Synopsis on disagreements in measuring tumor size at Copenhagen Acoustic Neuroma Conference. In: Tos M, Thomsen J, eds. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Acoustic Neuroma. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1992:975-978.
12. Gardner G, Robertson JH. Hearing preservation in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1988;97:55-66.
13. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery 1985;93:146-147.
14. Domb GH, Chole RA. Anatomical studies of the posterior petrous apex with regard to hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma removal, I. Laryngoscope 1980;90:1769-1776.
15. Sanna M, Zini C, Mazzoni A, et al. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: middle fossa versus suboccipital approach. Am J Otol 1987;8:500-506.
16. Silverstein H, Norrell H, Smouha E, et al. The singular canal: a valuable landmark in surgery of the internal auditory canal. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;98:138-143.
17. Shelton C, Brackmann DE, House WF, et al. Middle fossa acoustic tumor surgery: results in 106 cases. Laryngoscope 1989;99:405-408.
18. Kanzaki J, Ogawa K, Yamamoto M, et al. Results of acoustic neuroma surgery by extended middle cranial fossa approach. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1991;487:17-21.
19. Thedinger BS, Whittaker CK, Luetje CM. Recurrent acoustic tumor after a suboccipital removal. Neurosurgery 1991;29:681-687.
20. Roberson JB, Brackmann DE, Hitselberger WE. Acoustic neuroma recurrence after suboccipital resection: management with translabyrinthine resection. Am J Otol 1996;17:307-311.
21. McKennan KX. Endoscopy of the internal auditory canal during hearing conservation tumor surgery. Am J Otol 1993;14:259-262.
22. Haberkamp TJ, Meyer GA, Fox M. Surgical exposure of the fundus of the internal auditory canal: anatomic limits of the middle fossa versus the retrosigmoid transcanal approach. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1190-1194.
23. Magnan J, Chayas A, Caces F, et al. Contribution of endoscopy of the cerebellopontine angle by retrosigmoid approach: neuroma and vasculo-nervous compression. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 1993;110:259-265.
24. Swart JG, Schuknecht HF. Long-term effect of destruction of the endolymphatic sac in a primate species. Laryngoscope 1998;98:1183-1189.