Results of IAEA intercomparisons in the frame of indirect methods for assessing intakes of radionuclides

Applied Radiation and Isotopes

Volumn 61, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 373-379

  Suárez, Rodolfo Cruz ^a   Mrabit, Khammar ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; DOSIMETRY; PERSONNEL TRAINING;

COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PHANTOMS;

RADIOISOTOPES;

RADIOISOTOPE;

CONFERENCE PAPER; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION MONITORING; RADIATION PHYSICS; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOACTIVITY; TECHNIQUE;

INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; POWER PLANTS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOACTIVE POLLUTANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINALYSIS;

EID: 2942604325     PISSN: 09698043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.03.010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organisation, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, 1996. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources, Safety Series No. 115, IAEA, Vienna.
2. Gibson J.A., Birchall A., Bull R.K., Henrichs K., Iranzo E., Lord D.J., Piechowski J., Sollett E., Tancock N.P., Wernli C. A European intercomparison of methods used for the assessment of internally deposited radionuclides. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 40:1992;245-257
3. Gibson, J.A.B., Alvarez, A., Andrasi, A., Battersby, W.P., Birchall, A., Chevalier, C., Culot, J-P., Espinosa, A., Hurtgen, C., Malatova, I., Marsh, J.W., Phillips, R.F., Piechowski, J., Roberts, G.A., Stewart, P. A Second European Laboratories Intercomparison of Methods Used for the Assessment of Intakes of Internally Deposited Radionuclides. European Commission, to be published.
4. Hui T.E., Loesch R.M., Raddatz C., Fisher D.R., McDonald J.C. An internal dose intercomparison study. Health Phys. 67(3):1994;217-225
5. Hui T.E., Loesch R.M., McDonald J.C. The second internal dosimetry intercomparison study of the US Department of Energy. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 72(2):1997;131-138
6. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1996. Direct Methods for Measuring Radionuclides in the Human Body, Safety Series No. 114, IAEA, Vienna.
7. International Atomic Energy Agency, 1999. Intercomparison and biokinetic model validation of radionuclide intake assessment, IAEA-TECDOC-1071, Vienna.
8. International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Office, 1999. Assessment of occupational exposure due to intakes of radionuclides, Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1.2, IAEA, Vienna.
9. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000a. Indirect methods for assessing intakes of radionuclides causing occupational exposure, Safety Reports Series No. 18, IAEA, Vienna.
10. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2000b. Results of the 2000 intercomparison for individual monitoring of radiological measurements for monitoring purposes. Determination of gamma-emitting radionuclides in urine samples. Working Material, Vienna.
11. International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry services for individual monitoring of occupational exposure (in preparation).
12. International Atomic Energy Agency, in printing. Intercalibration of in-vivo counting systems using an Asian Phantom. IAEA-TECDOC.
13. International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety Report on Assessment of radiation doses from intakes of radionuclides by workers, in preparation.
14. Kathren R.L., Heid K.R., Swinth M.J. Comparisons of estimates of systemic Pu from uranium excretion. Health Phys. 30(5):1987;487-493
15. Ramsden D., Birchall A., Bull R.K., Foster P.P., Gibson J.A.B., Strong R., Taylor N.A., Tyler G.R., Wraight J. Laboratory intercomparison of method used for the assessments of systemic burdens of plutonium. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 30(2):1990;95-99
16. Ramsden D., Birchall A., Bull R.K., Foster P.P., Hutton C.F., Gibson J.A.B., Phillips R.F., Roberts G.A., Tancock N.P., Tenwick G.E., Wormald S., Wraight J.C. Laboratory intercomparisons on internal dosimetry - Part II. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 42(2):1992;97-102