A high unrounded vowel in Turkish: Is it a central or back vowel?

Speech Communication

Volumn 43, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 143-154

  Kiliç, Mehmet Akif ^a   Öǧüt, Fatih ^b  

^a KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Speech acoustics; Turkish; Vowels

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS; FREQUENCIES; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ARTICULATORY ANALYSES; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; TURKISH VOWELS; VOWELS;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 2942599466     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2004.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baer T., Gore J.C., Gracco L.C., Nye P.W. Analysis of vocal tract shape and dimensions using magnetic resonance imaging: vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1991;799-828.
2. Catford J.C. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. 1977;Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
3. Demircan Türkiye Türkçesinin Ses Düzeni, Türkiye Türkçesinde Sesler. 1979;Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara.
4. Demirezen M. Phonemics and Phonology: Theory through Analysis. 1986;Bizim Büro, Ankara.
5. Demolin D., Hassid S., Metens T., Soquet A. Real-time MRI and articulatory coordination in speech. C.R. Biologies. 325:2002;547-556.
6. Ergenç I. Türkiye Türkçesinin Görevsel Sesbilimi. 1989;Engin, Ankara.
7. Esling, J.H., 1994. University of Victoria Phonetic Database (Version 3). Speech Technology Research, Victoria.
8. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. second ed. 1970;Mouton, The Hague.
9. IPA Transcription Tutorial A Computer Program for CSL (Model 4335, Version 2.02). 1993;Kay Elemetrics, Pine Brook.
10. Johnson K., Flemming E., Wright R. The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language. 69:1993;505-528.
11. Kiliç M.A. Türkiye Türkçesi'ndeki ünlülerin sesbilgisel özellikleri. Özsoy A.S., Taylan E.E., Aksu-Koç A., Akar D., Nakipoǧlu M. Studies in Turkish Linguistics. 2003;3-18 Boǧaziçi University Press, Istanbul.
12. Kornfilt J. Turkish. 1997;Routledge, London.
13. Ladefoged P. The phonetic basis for computer speech processing. Fallside F., Woods W.A. Computer Speech Processing. 1985;3-27 Prentice-Hall International, London.
14. Ladefoged P. A Course in Phonetics. third ed. 1993;Harcourt Brace, Forth Worth.
15. Lewis G.L. Turkish Grammar. 1967;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Moore C.A. The correspondence of vocal tract resonance with volumes obtained from magnetic resonance images. J. Speech Hear. Res. 35:1992;1009-1023.
17. Rosner B.S., Pickering J.B. Vowel Perception and Production. 1994;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Selen N. Söyleyiş sesbilimi, akustik sesbilim ve Türkiye Türkçesi. 1979;Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara.
19. Shriberg L.D., Kent R.D. Clinical Phonetics. second ed. 1995;Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights.
20. Syrdal A.K. Aspects of a model of the auditory representation of American English vowels. Speech Commun. 4:1985;121-135.
21. Traunmüller H. Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels. Phonetica. 45:1988;1-29.
22. Whalen D.H., Kang A.M., Magen H.S., Fulbright R.K., Gore J.C. Predicting midsagittal pharynx shape from tongue position during vowel production. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 42:1999;592-603.
23. Wells J., House J. The Sounds of the International Phonetic Alphabet (Audio CD). 1995;University College London, London.
24. Zimmer K., Orgun O. Turkish. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. 1999;154-156 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.