Evaluation of the educational utility of patient follow-up

Academic Emergency Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 715-719

  Sadosty, Annie T ^a   Stead, Latha G ^a   Boie, Eric T ^a   Goyal, Deepi G ^a   Weaver, Amy L ^a   Decker, Wyatt W ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

ACGME general competencies; Emergency medicine; Graduate medical education; Patient follow up; Residency Review Committee for Emergency Medicine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EMERGENCY MEDICINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT;

EID: 2942596470     PISSN: 10696563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Gaeta TJ, Osborn HH. Increasing compliance with the residency review committee requirements for follow-up in academic emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33:510-5.
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available at: http://www.acgme.org. Accessed May 22, 2003.
3. Wright SM, Durbin P, Barker LR. When should learning about hospitalized patients end? Providing housestaff with post-discharge follow-up information. Acad Med. 2000; 75:380-3.
4. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available at: http://www.acgme.org. Accessed Oct 9, 2001.
5. Sanders A, Sulton L. RRC-EM report at the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors' meeting, Boston, MA, May 30, 2003.