Initial wave packets and the various power-law decreases of scattered wave packets at long times

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Miyamoto, Manabu ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES; HAMILTONIANS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY;

QUANTUM SYSTEMS; SQUARE BARRIER POTENTIALS; WAVE PACKETS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 2942593995     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.042704     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. L. A. Khalfin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 1371 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1053 (1958)].
2. L. A. Khalfin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 1371 (1957) [Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 1053 (1958)].
3. J. Rauch, Commun. Math. Phys. 61, 149 (1978); A. Jensen and T. Kato, Duke Math. J. 46, 583 (1979); M. Murata, J. Funct. Anal. 49, 10 (1982).
4. J. Rauch, Commun. Math. Phys. 61, 149 (1978); A. Jensen and T. Kato, Duke Math. J. 46, 583 (1979); M. Murata, J. Funct. Anal. 49, 10 (1982).
5. J. Rauch, Commun. Math. Phys. 61, 149 (1978); A. Jensen and T. Kato, Duke Math. J. 46, 583 (1979); M. Murata, J. Funct. Anal. 49, 10 (1982).
6. J. G. Muga, V. Delgado, and R. F. Snider, Phys. Rev. B 52, 16 381 (1995).
7. W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024608 (2002); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2867 (1999).
8. W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024608 (2002); Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2867 (1999).
9. G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028902 (2003). Notice that this made an end of the controversy about their previous result for the nonescape probability, in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995) . See also R. M. Cavalcanti, ibid. 80, 4353 (1998); G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, ibid. 80, 4354 (1998); W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, ibid. 90, 028901 (2003), and references therein.
10. G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028902 (2003). Notice that this made an end of the controversy about their previous result for the nonescape probability, in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995) . See also R. M. Cavalcanti, ibid. 80, 4353 (1998); G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, ibid. 80, 4354 (1998); W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, ibid. 90, 028901 (2003), and references therein.
11. G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028902 (2003). Notice that this made an end of the controversy about their previous result for the nonescape probability, in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995) . See also R. M. Cavalcanti, ibid. 80, 4353 (1998); G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, ibid. 80, 4354 (1998); W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, ibid. 90, 028901 (2003), and references therein.
12. G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028902 (2003). Notice that this made an end of the controversy about their previous result for the nonescape probability, in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995) . See also R. M. Cavalcanti, ibid. 80, 4353 (1998); G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, ibid. 80, 4354 (1998); W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, ibid. 90, 028901 (2003), and references therein.
13. G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 028902 (2003). Notice that this made an end of the controversy about their previous result for the nonescape probability, in Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 337 (1995) . See also R. M. Cavalcanti, ibid. 80, 4353 (1998); G. García-Calderón, J. L. Mateos, and M. Moshinsky, ibid. 80, 4354 (1998); W. van Dijk and Y. Nogami, ibid. 90, 028901 (2003), and references therein.
14. P. T. Greenland, Nature (London) 335, 298 (1988).
15. K. Unnikrishnan, Am. J. Phys. 65, 526 (1997); 66, 632 (1998).
16. K. Unnikrishnan, Am. J. Phys. 65, 526 (1997); 66, 632 (1998).
17. F. Lillo and R. N. Mantegna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1061 (2000); 84, 4516 (2000).
18. F. Lillo and R. N. Mantegna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1061 (2000); 84, 4516 (2000).
19. J. A. Damborenea, I. L. Egusquiza, and J. G. Muga, Am. J. Phys. 70, 738 (2002).
20. M. Miyamoto, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022702 (2003); J. Phys. A 35, 7159 (2002).
21. M. Miyamoto, Phys. Rev. A 68, 022702 (2003); J. Phys. A 35, 7159 (2002).
22. See, for example, J. G. Muga, in Time in Quantum Mechanics, edited by J. G. Muga, R. Sala Mayato, and I. L. Egusquiza (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001)
23. E. T. Copson, Asymptotic Expansions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1965), Chap. 3.
24. H. Nakazato, M. Namiki, and S. Pascazio, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 247 (1996), Sec. 3.3.
25. 0+d < -R.
26. L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics 3/e(McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1968).
27. M. S. de Bianchi, J. Math. Phys. 35, 2719 (1994).
28. -3/2 dominates.
29. One may notice that the situation considered here is just the same as in Fig. 18 in the textbook [15].