Combined technique with polyethylene fibers and composite resins in restoration of traumatized anterior teeth

Dental Traumatology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 172-177

  Vitale, Marina Consuelo ^a   Caprioglio, Claudia ^b   Martignone, Alessandra ^a   Marchesi, Umberto ^a   Botticelli, A R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Polyethylene fibers; Restoration; Trauma

Indexed keywords

POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; ESTHETICS; HUMAN; SCHOOL CHILD; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; INCISOR; POLYETHYLENES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 2942587460     PISSN: 16004469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-4469.2004.00201.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Samadzadeh A, Kugel G. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations reinforced with plasma-treated woven polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78(5):447-9.
2. Vallittu PK, Vojtkova H, Lassila VP. Impact strength of venture polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wire. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:392-6.
3. Manley TR, Bowman AJ, Cook M. Denture bases reinforced with carbon fibres. Br Dent J 1979;146:25.
4. DeBoer J, Vermilyea SG, Brady RE. The effect of carbon fiber orientation on the fatigue resistance and bending properties of two denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:119-21.
5. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:543-7.
6. Goldberg AJ, Burnstone CJ. The use of continuous fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197-202.
7. Uzun G, Hersek N, Tincer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81(5):616-20.
8. Berrong JM, Weed RM, Young JM. Fracture resistance of Kevlar-reinforced polymethyl methacrylate resin: a preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:391-5.
9. Ramos V, Runyan D, Christenrisen L. The effect of plasma-treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76(1):94-6.
10. Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappaleinen R. Acrylic resin-fiber composite. Part I. The effect of fiber concentration on fracture resistance. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:607-12.
11. Vallittu PK. Ultra high modulus polyethylene ribbon as reinforcement for denture polymethyl methacrylate: a short communication. Dent Mater 1997;13:381-2.
12. Ladizesky NH, Cheng YY, Chow TW, Ward IM. Acrylic resin reinforced with chopped high performance polyethylene fiber - properties and denture construction. Dent Mater 1993;9:128-35.
13. Gutteridge DL. The effect of including ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre on the impact strength of acrylic resin. Br Dent J 1988;164:177-80.
14. Branden M, Davy KWM, Parker S, Ladizesky NH, Ward IM. Denture base poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra high modulus polyethylene fibres. Br Dent J 1988;164:109-13.
15. Dixon DL, Breeding LC. The transverse strengths of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:417-9.