Psychological support for the concept of psycholegal competencies

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 223-232

  Coles, E M ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CURRICULUM; EXPERT WITNESS; INTELLIGENCE; LAW; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW;

EID: 2942574368     PISSN: 01602527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ayer A.J. The problem of knowledge. 1956;Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
2. Bonnie R.J. The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 10:1992;291-316
3. Coles E.M. Scientific support for the legal concept of automatism. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law. 7(1):2000;33-50
4. Coles E.M., Armstrong S.M. Hughlings Jackson on automatism as disinhibition. Journal of Law and Medicine. 6(1):1998;73-82
5. Coles E.M., Jang D. A psychologist looks at automatism. The Advocate. 48(2):1990;199-203
6. Coles E.M., Jang D. A psychological perspective on the legal concepts of 'volition' and 'intent'. Journal of Law and Medicine. 4(1):1996;60-71
7. Coles E.M., Pos R. Assessment of fitness to stand trial: The need for a profile rather than a scale. Psychological Reports. 57:1985;1051-1054
8. Coles E.M., Pos R. Assessment of fitness to stand trial: A critique. Medicine and Law. 5:1986;489-498
9. Gardner H. Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligence. 1983;Basic Books, New York
10. Gardner H. Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. 1993;Basic Books, New York
11. Gillie O. Crucial data faked by eminent psychologist. 1976;24 Sunday Times, London
12. Gold A.D. Drunkenness and criminal responsibility. Chapter four part one. Hucker S.J., Webster C.D., Ben-Aron M.H. Mental disorder and criminal responsibility. 1981;63-77 Butterworth, Toronto, Canada
13. Golding S.L., Roesch R. Competency for adjudication: An international analysis. Weisstub D.N. Law and Mental Health: International Perspectives. vol. 4:1988;73-109 Pergamon, New York
14. Grisso T., Appelbaum P., Mulvey E., Fletcher K. The MacArthur treatment competence study: II. Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment. Law and Human Behavior. 19:1995;127-148
15. Grisso T., Appelbaum P., Mulvey E., Fletcher K. The MacArthur treatment competence study: III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments. Law and Human Behavior. 19:1995;149-174
16. Heilbrun K., Rogers R., Otto R.K. Forensic assessment: Current status and future directions. Ogloff J.R.P. Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century. 2002;119-146 Kluwer Academic Publishing, New York. Chapter 4
17. Hess A.K. Defining forensic psychology. Chap. 2. Hess A.K., Weiner I.B. The handbook of forensic psychology. 2nd ed. 1999;24-47 Wiley, New York
18. Jang D., Coles E.M. The evolution and definition of the concept of 'automatism' in Canadian case law. Medicine and Law. 14(3/4):1995;221-238
19. Melton G.B., Petrila J., Poythress N.G., Slobogin C. Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. 1987;The Guilford Press, New York
20. Murphy K.R., Davidshofer C.O. Psychological testing: Principles and applications. 5th ed. 2001;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
21. Pap A. Reduction-sentences and open concepts. Methods. 5:1953;3-30. (Cited by Millon, 1991)
22. Roesch R., Jackson M.A., Sollner R., Eaves D., Glackman W., Webster C.D. The fitness to stand trial interview test: How four professions rate videotaped fitness interviews. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 7:1984;115-131
23. Roesch R., Webster C.D., Eaves D. The fitness interview test: A method for examining fitness to stand trial. 1984;Research Report, Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto, Toronto
24. Roesch R., Zapf P.A., Golding S.L., Skeem J.L. Defining and assessing competency to stand trial. Hess A.K., Weiner I.B. The handbook of forensic psychology (chap. 12). 2nd ed. 1999;327-349 Wiley, New York
25. Skeem J.L., Golding S.L., Cohn N.B., Berge G. The logic and reliability of evaluations of competence to stand trial. Law and Human Behavior. 22(5):1997;519-547
26. Spearman C. 'General intelligence' objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology. 15:1904;201-293
27. Spearman C. The abilities of man. 1927;Macmillan, New York
28. Veiel H.O.F., Coles E.M. Measurement of unfitness to stand trial: Psychological analysis of a legal issue. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 44:1999;356-361
29. Wertheimer M. Hebb and Senden on the role of learning in perception. American Journal of Psychology. 64:1951;133-137
30. White R.W. Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review. 66(5):1959;297-333
31. Wiggins J.S., Renner K.E., Clore G.L., Rose R.J. The psychology of personality. 1971;Addison-Wesley Publishing, Menlo Park, CA
32. Wolins L. Responsibility for raw data. American Psychologist. 17(9):1962;657-658 Legal citations
33. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, (1993). 113.S. Ct. 2786.
34. Godinez v. Moran, (1993). 113 St.C. 2680.
35. Kumho Tire v. Carmichael (1999). SCT-QL 52 119 S.Ct. 1167.
36. People v. Harris, (1983). 113 Ill. App. 3d 633.
37. R. v. Whittle, (1994) 2 S.C.R. 914.