The relationship of health care delivery system characteristics and legal factors to mode of delivery in women with prior cesarean section: A systematic review

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 94-103

  Kraemer, Dale F ^a   Berlin, Michelle ^a,b   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Oregon Hlth S ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CESAREAN SECTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; EMBASE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDLINE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REGISTER; REIMBURSEMENT; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 2942572879     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (2000). Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Cesarean Delivery, 1-59
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) (2002, May 6). Nation's obstetrical care endangered by growing liability insurance crisis. ACOG Press Release. Retrieved June 16, 2003 from the World Wide Web: http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr05-06-02-1.cfm
3. Bailit J.L., Garrett J.M., Miller W.C., McMahon M.J., Cefalo R.C. Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 187:(3):2002;721-727
4. Barnsley J.M., Vayda E., Lomas J., Enkin M.W., Pierre K.D., Anderson G.M., et al. Cesarean section in Ontario practice patterns and responses to hypothetical cases. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 33:(2):1990;128-132
5. Berkowitz G.S., Fiarman G.S., Mojica M.A., Bauman J., de Regt R.H. Effect of physician characteristics on the cesarean birth rate. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 161:(1):1989;146-149
6. Bickell N.A., Zdeb M.S., Applegate M.S., Roohan P.J., Sui A.L. Effect of external peer review on cesarean delivery rates a statewide program. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 87:(5 Pt 1):1996;664-667
7. Chambliss L.R., Daly C., Medearis A.L., Ames M., Kayne M., Paul R. The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 80:(2):1992;161-165
8. Coco A.S., Gates T.J., Gallagher M.E., Horst M.A. Association of attending physician specialty with the cesarean delivery rate in the same patient population. Family Medicine. 32:(9):2000;639-644
9. Coulter C.H., Lehrfeld R. When push comes to shove implementing VBAC practice guidelines. Physician Executive. 21:(6):1995;30-35
10. Curtin S.C., Kozak L.J. Cesarean delivery rates in 1995 continue to decline in the United States. Birth. 24:(3):1997;194-196
11. Davis L.G., Riedmann G.L., Sapiro M., Minogue J.P., Kazer R.R. Cesarean section rates in low-risk private patients managed by certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 39:(2):1994;91-97
12. Deutchman M.E., Sills D., Connor P.D. Perinatal outcomes a comparison between family physicians and obstetricians. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 8:(6):1995;440-447
13. Goldman G., Pineault R., Bilodeau H., Blais R. Effects of patient, physician and hospital characteristics on the likelihood of vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Quebec. CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). 143:(10):1990;1017-1024
14. Goldman G., Pineault R., Potvin L., Blais R., Bilodeau H. Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section. American Journal of Public Health. 83:(8):1993;1104-1108
15. Gregory K.D., Korst L.M., Cane P., Platt L.D., Kahn K. Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 94:(6):1999;985-989
16. Gregory K.D., Ramicone E., Chan L., Kahn K.L. Cesarean deliveries for Medicaid patients a comparison in public and private hospitals in Los Angeles county. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 180:(5):1999;1177-1184
17. Guise, J., McDonagh, M., Hashima, J., Kraemer, D., Eden, K., Berlin, M., et al. (2003). Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC). Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract no. 290-97-0018). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publication
18. Hamilton B.E., Martin J.A., Sutton P.D. Births preliminary data for 2002. National Vital Statistics Reports. 51:2003;1-20
19. Hangsleben K.L., Taylor M.A., Lynn N.M. VBAC program in a nurse-midwifery service. Five years of experience. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 34:(4):1989;179-184
20. Harrington L.C., Miller D.A., McClain C.J., Paul R.H. Vaginal birth after cesarean in a hospital-based birth center staffed by certified nurse-midwives. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 42:(4):1997;304-307
21. Harris R.P., Helfand M., Woolf S.H., Lohr K.N., Mulrow C.D., Teutsch S.M., et al. Methods of the third U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 20:(Suppl.):2001;21-35
22. Hueston W.J. Obstetric referral in family practice. Factors Affecting Cesarean Section (FACS) Study Group. Journal of Family Practice. 38:(4):1994;368-372
23. Hueston W.J., Rudy M. Differences in labor and delivery experience in family physician- and obstetrician-supervised teaching services. Family Medicine. 27:(3):1995;182-187
24. Iglesias S., Burn R., Saunders L.D. Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital. CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). 145:(11):1991;1459-1464
25. Khan, K., Riet, G., Popay, J., Nixon, J., Kleijnen, J. (2001). Study quality assessment. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research Effectiveness: CRD's Guidance for those Carrying Out or Commissioning Reviews. York, UK: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2001
26. King D.E., Lahiri K. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Journal of the American Medical Association. 272:(7):1994;524-529
27. Kumar S., Maouris P. Induction of labour for trial of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a remote district hospital. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 36:(4):1996;417-420
28. Lieberman E., Lang J.M., Heffner L.J., Cohen A. Assessing the role of case mix in cesarean delivery rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 92:(1):1998;1-7
29. Lomas J., Anderson G.M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M.W., Hannah W.J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine. 321:(19):1989;1306-1311
30. Lomas J., Enkin M., Anderson G.M., Hannah W.J., Vayda E., Singer J. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. Journal of the American Medical Association. 265:(17):1991;2202-2207
31. Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., Martin D.P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. New England Journal of Medicine. 345:(1):2001;3-8
32. Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Ventura S.J., Menacker F., Park M.M. Births final data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports. 50:(5):2002;1-101
33. McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A., Olshan A.F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine. 335:(10):1996;689-695
34. Menacker F., Curtin S.C. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99. National Vital Statistics Reports. 49:(13):2001;1-16
35. Miller E.S., Partezana J., Montgomery R.L. Vaginal birth after cesarean a 5-year experience in a family practice residency program. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice. 8:(5):1995;357-360
36. Miller M., Leader L.R. Vaginal delivery after caesarean section. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 32:(3):1992;213-216
37. Mor-Yosef S., Zeevi D., Samueloff A., Donhin M., Frankfurter H., Schenker J.G. Vaginal delivery following one previous cesarean birth nation wide survey. Asia-Oceania Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 16:(1):1990;33-37
38. Myers S.A., Gleicher N. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates. New England Journal of Medicine. 319:(23):1988;1511-1516
39. Myers S.A., Gleicher N. The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program an update after 6 years. Social Science & Medicine. 37:(10):1993;1219-1222
40. National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. (1981). Cesarean Childbirth: Report of a Consensus Development Conference Sponsored by the NICHD in Conjunction with the National Center for Health Care Technology and Assisted by the Office for Medical Applications of Research. NIH Publication, 82-2067
41. Oleske D.M., Linn E.S., Nachman K.L., Marder R.J., Thompson L.D. Cesarean and VBAC delivery rates in Medicaid managed care, Medicaid fee-for-service, and private managed care. Birth. 25:(2):1998;125-127
42. Paterson C.M., Saunders N.J. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section audit of current practice in a health region. British Medical Journal. 303:(6806):1991;818-821
43. Placek P.J., Taffel S.M. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in the 1980s. American Journal of Public Health. 78:(5):1988;512-515
44. Porreco R.P. High cesarean section rate a new perspective. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 65:(3):1985;307-311
45. Rageth J.C., Juzi C., Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 93:(3):1999;332-337
46. Raynor B.D. The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community practice. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 168:(1 Pt 1):1993;60-62
47. Sanchez-Ramos L., Kaunitz A.M., Peterson H.B., Martinez-Schnell B., Thompson R.J. Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 163:(3):1990;1081-1087. (discussion 1087-1088)
48. Santerre R.E. The effect of the ACOG guideline on vaginal births after cesarean. Medical Care Research & Review. 53:(3):1996;315-329
49. Schimmel L.M., Hogan P., Boehler B., DiFelice M., Cooney A., Schimmel L.D. The Yolo County Midwifery Service. A descriptive study of 496 singleton birth outcomes, 1990. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 37:(6):1992;398-403
50. Shiono P.H., Fielden J.G., McNellis D., Rhoads G.G., Pearse W.H. Recent trends in cesarean birth and trial of labor rates in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association. 257:(4):1987;494-497
51. Sieck C.C. Vaginal birth after cesarean section a comparison of rural and metropolitan rates in Oklahoma. Journal - Oklahoma State Medical Association. 90:(8):1997;444-449
52. Sinusas K. Deliveries by family physicians in Connecticut results of a practice-based research network. Archives of Family Medicine. 9:(5):2000;434-438
53. Skelton A.G. The relationship among cost, quality, and competition an analysis of obstetrics services in Missouri hospitals. Journal of Health Care Finance. 24:(1):1997;30-44
54. Smith G.C.S., Pell J.P., Cameron A.D., Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Journal of the American Medical Association. 287:(20):2002;2684- 2690
55. Stafford R.S. Cesarean section use and source of payment an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts. American Journal of Public Health. 80:(3):1990;313-315
56. Stafford R.S. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section. Journal of the American Medical Association. 265:(1):1991;59-63
57. Stone S.E., Brown M.P., Westcott J.P. Nurse-midwifery service in a rural setting. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 41:(5):1996;377-382
58. Studnicki J., Remmel R., Campbell R., Werner D.C. The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates the Florida experience. American Journal of Medical Quality. 12:(1):1997;62-68
59. Wagner C.L., Metts A.K. Rates of successful vaginal delivery after cesarean for patients with private versus public insurance. Journal of Perinatology. 19:(1):1999;14-18
60. Walton D.L., Ludlow D., Willis D.C. Vaginal birth after cesarean section. Acceptance and outcome at a rural hospital. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 38:(9):1993;716-718
61. Whitsel A.I., Capeless E.C., Abel D.E., Stuart G.S. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates university versus community hospitals in Vermont. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 183:(5):2000;1170-1175