An empirically-based assessment of Belbin’s team roles

Human Resource Management Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 54-60

  Senior, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942571977     PISSN: 09545395     EISSN: 17488583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.1998.tb00173.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bales, R. F. 1950. ‘A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, Vol. 15, April, 257–63.
2. Belbin, R. M. 1981. Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail, London: Heinemann.
3. Belbin, R. M. 1993. Team Roles at Work, Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
4. Belbin Associates. Interplace IV Human Resource Management System User's Manual. Cambridge.
5. Broucek, W. G. and Randell, G. 1996. ‘An assessment of the construct validity of the Belbin Self-Perception Inventory and Observer's Assessment from the perspective of the five-factor model. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, Vol. 69, 389–405.
6. Child, D. 1990. The Essentials of Factor Analysis, London: Cassell.
7. Furnham, A, Steele, H. and Pendleton, D. 1993. ‘A psychometric assessment of the Belbin Team-Role Self-Perception Inventory. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, Vol. 66, 245–247.
8. GAP computer analysis programme run by the Manchester Computing Centre.
9. Senior, B. 1997. ‘Team roles and team performance: is there “really” a link. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, no. 70, 241–258.
10. Swailes, S. and Senior, B. 1996. ‘Looks good, but…: The validity of learning style and team role measures. Published proceedings of the British Academy of Management Annual Conference, September.
11. Trompenaars, F. 1993. Riding the Waves of Culture, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.