Randomized trials for selective site pacing: Do we know where we are going?

PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Volumn 27, Issue 6 PART II, 2004, Pages 878-882

  Gammage, Michael D ^a,b   Marsh, Anna Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Randomized trials; Selective site pacing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY SINUS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; HEART ATRIUM APPENDAGE; HEART ATRIUM ARRHYTHMIA; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PACING; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 2942571108     PISSN: 01478389     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00550.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. The David Trial Investigators. Dual chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator. The dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 2002; 288:3115-3123.
2. Sweeney MO, Hellcamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al., Mode Selection Trial investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003; 107:2932-2937.
3. Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, et al. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 117 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:614-623.
4. Wiggers CJ. The muscular reactions of the mammalian ventricles to artificial surface stimuli. Am J Physiol 1925; 73C:275-282.
5. Grover M, Glantz SA. Endocardial pacing site affects left ventricular end-diastolic volume and performance in the intact anaesthetized dog. Circ Res 1983; 53:72-85.
6. Burkhoff D, Oikawa RY, Sagawa K. Influence of pacing site on canine left ventricular contraction. Am J Physiol 1986; 251:H428-435.
7. Park RC, Little WC, O'Rourke RA. Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs. Circ Res 1985; 57:706-717.
8. Giudici MC, Karpawich PP. Alternative site pacing: It's time to define the terms. PACE 1999; 22:551-553.
9. Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, et al., ROVA investigators. Right ventricular outflow tract versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1180-1186.
10. Brady PA, Hammill SC. Ventricular-based pacing: One site fits all? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1187-1188.
11. Barin ES, Jones SM, Ward DE, et al. The right ventricular outflow tract as an alternative permanent pacing site: long-term follow-up. PACE 1991; 14:3-6.
12. De Cock CC, Meyer A, Kamp O. Assessment of left ventricular function in relation to electrode position: Effects of right ventricular outflow tract pacing. (abstract) PACE 1992; 15:511.
13. Giudici MC, Thornburg GA, Buck DL, et al. Comparison of right ventricular outflow tract and apical lead permanent pacing on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79:209-212.
14. Benchimol A, Liggett MS. Cardiac hemodynamics during stimulation of the right atrium, right ventricle and left ventricle in normal and abnormal hearts. Circulation 1966; 33:933-944.
15. Barold SS, Linhart JW, Hildner FJ, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of endocardial pacing of outflow and inflow tracts of the right ventricle. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23:697-701.
16. Cowell R, Morris-Thurgood J, Ilsley C, et al. Septal short atrioventricular delay pacing: Additional hemodynamic improvements in heart failure. PACE 1994; 17:1980-1983.
17. Buckingham TA, Candinas R, Schlapfer J, et al. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrioventricular pacing at differing sites in the right ventricle individually and simultaneously. PACE 1997; 20:909-915.
18. Karpawich PP, Mital S. Comparative left ventricular function following atrial, septal, and apical single chamber heart pacing in the young. PACE 1997; 20:1983-1988.
19. Buckingham TA, Candinas R, Attenhofer C, et al. Systolic and diastolic function with alternate and combined site pacing in the right ventricle. PACE 1998; 21:1077-1084.
20. de Cock CC, Meyer A, Kamp O, et al. Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: Comparison with right ventricular apical pacing. PACE 1998; 21:536-541.
21. Alboni P, Scarfo S, Fuca G, et al. Short-term hemodynamic effects of DDD pacing from ventricular apex, right ventricular outflow tract and proximal septum. G Ital Cardiol 1998; 28:237-241.
22. Mera F, DeLurgio DB, Patterson RE, et al. A comparison of ventricular function during high right ventricular septal and apical pacing after His-bundle ablation for refractory atrial fibrillation. PACE 1999; 22:1234-1239.
23. Victor F, Leclercq C, Mabo P, et al. Optimal right ventricular pacing site in chronically implanted patients: A prospective randomized crossover comparison of apical and outflow tract pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:311-316.
24. Puggioni E, Brignole M, Gammage M, et al. Acute comparative effect of right and left ventricular pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43:234-238.
25. Schwaab B, Frohlig G, Alexander C, et al. Influence of right ventricular stimulation site on left ventricular function in atrial synchronous ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:317-323.
26. Harris ZI, Marshall HJ, Gammage MD. The effects of lead position on cardiac function in de novo dual chamber implants: A randomized, prospective study of high septal versus apical lead positioning within the normal heart. (abstract) PACE 1999; 22:751.
27. Harris ZI, Ng GA, Marshall HJ, et al. Effects of right ventricular septal pacing on electrical and mechanical function: 12-month follow-up of a prospective randomized study. (abstract) PACE 2000; 23:614.
28. Kolettis TM, Kyriakides ZS, Tsiapras D, et al. Improved left ventricular relaxation during short-term right ventricular outflow tract compared to apical pacing. Chest 2000; 117:60-64.
29. Tse HF, Wong KK, Tsang V, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: The effects of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1451-1458.
30. de Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing. Europace 2003; 5:275-278.
31. Brady PA, Hammill SC. Ventricular-based pacing: one size fits all? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1187-1188.
32. Daubert C, Gras D, Berder V, et al. Permanent atrial resynchronization by synchronous bi-atrial pacing in the preventative treatment of atrial flutter associated with high degree interatrial block. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1994; 87:1535-1546.
33. Saksena S, Prakash A, Hill M, et al. Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:687-694.
34. Saksena S, Prakash A, Ziegler P, et al., DAPPAF investigators. Improved suppression of recurrent atrial fibrillation with dual-site right atrial pacing and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:1140-1150.
35. Lau CP, Tse HF, Yu CM, et al., NIPP-AF investigators. Dual-site atrial pacing for atrial fibrillation in patients without bradycardia. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:371-375.
36. Padeletti L, Pieragnoli P, Ciapetti C, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of right atrial appendage pacing versus interatrial septum pacing for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus bradycardia. Am Heart J 2001; 142:1047-1055.
37. Padeletti L, Purerfellner H, Adler SW, et al., for the Worldwide ASPECT Investigators. Combined efficacy of atrial septal lead placement and atrial pacing algorithms for prevention of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14:1189-1195.
38. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular cause. N Engl J Med 2000; 342:1385-1391.