An individual-based fishery model and assessing fishery stability

Natural Resource Modeling

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 231-247

  Helu, S Langitoto ^a   Anderson, James J ^b   Sampson, David B ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Catch partitioning; Competition; Fish stock size; Fisheries dynamics; Fishing rights; Fleet size; Individual based model

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942565523     PISSN: 08908575     EISSN: 19397445     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-7445.1999.tb00011.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. T. Bjorndal and J.M. Conrad [1987], Capital Dynamics in the North Sea Herring Fishery, Marine Res. Econom. 4, 63–74.
2. N.E. Bockstael and J.J. Opaluch [1983], Discrete Modelling of Supply Response under Uncertainty: The Case of the Fishery, J. Environ. Econom. Management 10, 125–137.
3. D.L. DeAngelis, L.W. Barnthouse, W. Van Winkle and R.G. Otto [1990], A Critical Appraisal of Population Approaches in Assessing Fish Community Health, J. Great Lakes Res. 16, 576–590.
4. V.F. Gallucci, B. Amjoun, J. Hedgepeth and H.L. Lai [1996], Size-Based Methods of Stock Assessment of Small-Scale Fisheries, in Stock Assessment. Quantitative Methods and Applications for Small-Scale Fisheries (V.F. Gallucci, S.B. Saila, D.J. Gustafson and B.J. Rothschild, eds.), CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
5. W.S.C. Gurney and R.M. Nisbet [1979], Ecological Stability and Social Hierarchy, Theoret. Population Biol. 16, 48–80.
6. S.S. Hanna [1989], The Eighteenth Century English Commons: A Model for Ocean Management, Working Paper No. 89–106, Agriculture Resource Econom., Oregon State University.
7. G. Hardin [1968], The Tragedy of the Commons, Science 162, 1243–1248.
8. R. Hilborn [1985], Fleet Dynamics and Individual Variation: Why Some People Catch More Fish than Others, Canad. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 2–13.
9. R. Hilborn and C.J. Walters [1992], Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty, Chapman & Hall, Inc., London.
10. A. Lomnicki [1980], Regulation of Population Density Due to Individual Differences and Patchy Environment, Oikos 35, 185–193.
11. A. Lomnicki [1992], Population Ecology from the Individual Perspective, in Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology. Populations, Communities, and Ecosystems (D.L. De Angelis and L.J. Gross, eds.), 1992 Symposium.
12. A. Lomnicki and J. Ombach [1984], Resource Partitioning within a Single Species Population and Population Stability: A Theoretical Model, Theoret. Population Biol. 24, 21–28.
13. A. Lomnicki and S. Sedziwy [1988], Resource Partitioning and Population Stability under Exploitation Competition, J. Theoret. Biol. 132, 119–120.
14. A. Lomnicki and S. Sedziwy [1989], Do Individual Differences in Resource Intakes without Monopolization Cause Population Stability and Persistence ?, J. Theoret. Biol. 136, 317–326.
15. W.E. Ricker [1975], Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations, Fish. Res. Board Canad. Bull. 191, 150.
16. D.B. Sampson [1992], Fishing Technology and Fleet Dynamics: Predictions from a Bioeconomic Model, Marine Res. Econom. 7, 37–58.