Rhetoric as Balance: A Dialectical Feminist Perspective

Women's Studies in Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 137-150

  Downey, Sharon D ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942550154     PISSN: 07491409     EISSN: 2152999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07491409.1997.10162407     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bakhtin, M. M., 1981. The dialogic imagination:Four essays by, Edited by:Bakhtin, M. M., Holquist, M., Emerson, C., and Holquist, M., Austin, TX:University of Texas Press.
2. Baxter, L. A., 1994. “ A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance ”. In Communication and relational maintenance, 233–254. New York:Academic Press.
3. Baxter, L. A., 1993. Relationship maintenance strategies and dialectical contradictions in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10:225–242.
4. Brown, R. H., 1983. Dialectical irony, literary form and sociological theory. Poetics Today, 4:542–564.
5. Burke, K., 1969. A grammar of motives, Berkeley, CA:University of California Press. Original published in 1945
6. Chesebro, J. W., 1984. The symbolic construction of social realities:A case study in the rhetorical criticism of paradox. Communication Quarterly, 32:164–171.
7. Cohen, S. P., and Arnone, H. C., 1988. Conflict resolution as the alternative to terrorism. Journal of Social Issues, 44:175–199.
8. Dow, B. J., 1995. Feminism, difference(s), and rhetorical studies. Communication Studies, 46:106–117.
9. Downey, S. D., 1997. Dialectical dimensions of mother-daughter communication Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Monterey, CA
10. Downey, S. D., 1996. Feminine power in Disney's. Beauty and the Beast. Women's Studies in Communication, 19:185–212.
11. Downey, S. D., Amper, A., Bastian, K., Berry, R., McCaskill, A., McPherson, D., Murphy, T., and Rasmussen, K., 1996, February. Gender, paradox, and transcendence:Discovering spirit in Disney animated films Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, Pasadena, CA
12. Hocker, J. L., and Wilmot, W. W., 1997. Interpersonal Conflict, 5th ed., Dubuque, IA:Wm. C. Brown.
13. Gottman, J. M., 1994. What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes, Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
14. Grossberg, L., 1979. Marxist dialectics and rhetorical criticism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65:235–249.
15. Jablonski, C., 1988. Rhetoric, paradox, and the movement for women's ordination in the Roman Catholic church. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 74:164–183.
16. Jameson, F., 1971. Marxism and form:Twentieth-century dialectical theories of literature, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
17. Railsback, C. C., 1984. The contemporary American abortion controversy:Stages in the argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70:410–424.
18. Rasmussen, K., Downey, S. D., Brooks, C., Curtis, K., Farmer, K., Robinson, P., and Sieber, N., 1997, November. Empowerment and cultural appropriation Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL
19. Rasmussen, K., and Downey, S. D., 1989. Dialectical disorientation in. Agnes of God. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53:66–84.
20. Rawlins, W. K., 1992. Friendship matters:Communication, dialectics, and the life course, New York:Aldine De Gruyter.
21. Rushing, J. F., 1986. The rhetoric of the American western myth. Communication Monographs, 50:14–32.
22. Rushing, J. F., 1993. Power, other, and spirit in cultural texts. Western Journal of Communication, 57:159–168.
23. Rushing, J. R., and Frentz, T. S., 1989. The Frankenstein myth in contemporary cinema. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 6:61–80.
24. Riegel, K. F., 1976, October. “ The dialectics of human development ”. In American Psychologist t–689.
25. Stack, G. J., 1971. On the notion of dialectics. Philosophy Today, 15:279–292.