Barriers to HIV testing: A survey of GUM clinic attendees [2]

Sexually Transmitted Infections

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 247-248

  Burns, F ^a,c   Mercer, C H ^a   Mercey, D ^a   Sadiq, S T ^a   Curran, B ^b   Kell, P ^b  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b Camden Primary Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS PREVALENCE; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING;

EID: 2942547322     PISSN: 13684973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2003.007682     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Department of Health. The national strategy for sexual health and HIV. London: DoH, 2001.
2. Jones S, Sadler T, Low N, et al. Does uptake of antenatal HIV testing depend on the individual midwife? Cross sectional study. BMJ 1998;316:272-3.
3. Griffiths M, Stockdale H, Winter AJ, et al. Uptake of HIV testing in a genitourinary medicine clinic is affected by individual doctors. Sex Transm Infect 2001;77:143-4.
4. British Co-operative Clinical Group. Screening for HIV infection in genitourinary medicine clinics: a lost opportunity? Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:307-10.