-
2
-
-
0003884163
-
-
New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
-
Harwood-Nuss A, Wolfson AB, Linden CH, Shepherd SM, Stenkyft PH (eds). The Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine, Third Edition. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
-
(2001)
The Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine, Third Edition
-
-
Harwood-Nuss, A.1
Wolfson, A.B.2
Linden, C.H.3
Shepherd, S.M.4
Stenkyft, P.H.5
-
3
-
-
0003770772
-
-
St. Louis, MO: Mosby
-
Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM, et al. Rosen's Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice, Fifth Edition. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2002.
-
(2002)
Rosen's Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice, Fifth Edition
-
-
Marx, J.A.1
Hockberger, R.S.2
Walls, R.M.3
-
6
-
-
0035345719
-
Digital rectal examination for trauma: Does every patient need one?
-
Porter JM, Ursic CM. Digital rectal examination for trauma: does every patient need one? Am Surg. 2001; 67:438-41.
-
(2001)
Am Surg
, vol.67
, pp. 438-441
-
-
Porter, J.M.1
Ursic, C.M.2
-
7
-
-
0031917847
-
Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with acute blunt trauma
-
American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical policy for the initial approach to patients presenting with acute blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31:422-54.
-
(1998)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.31
, pp. 422-454
-
-
-
8
-
-
0032920956
-
Methodological standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine
-
Stiell IG, Wells GA. Methodological standards for the development of clinical decision rules in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33:437-47.
-
(1999)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.33
, pp. 437-447
-
-
Stiell, I.G.1
Wells, G.A.2
-
9
-
-
0029939054
-
Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?
-
Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Barta DC, Steiner J. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27:305-8.
-
(1996)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.27
, pp. 305-308
-
-
Gilbert, E.H.1
Lowenstein, S.R.2
Koziol-McLain, J.3
Barta, D.C.4
Steiner, J.5
-
10
-
-
0020741664
-
If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right?
-
Hanley J, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? JAMA. 1993; 249:1743-5.
-
(1993)
JAMA
, vol.249
, pp. 1743-1745
-
-
Hanley, J.1
Lippman-Hand, A.2
-
11
-
-
0036733618
-
Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma
-
Touger M, Gennis P, Nathanson N, et al. Validity of a decision rule to reduce cervical spine radiography in elderly patients with blunt trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40:287-93.
-
(2002)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.40
, pp. 287-293
-
-
Touger, M.1
Gennis, P.2
Nathanson, N.3
-
12
-
-
0034961779
-
Epidemiology of cervical spine injury victims
-
Lowery DW, Wald MM, Browne BJ, Tigges S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, NEXUS Group. Epidemiology of cervical spine injury victims. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38:12-6.
-
(2001)
Ann Emerg Med
, vol.38
, pp. 12-16
-
-
Lowery, D.W.1
Wald, M.M.2
Browne, B.J.3
Tigges, S.4
Hoffman, J.R.5
Mower, W.R.6
-
13
-
-
0024327724
-
Age-associated change in pain threshold measured by transcutaneous neuronal electrical stimulation
-
Tucker MA, Andrew MF, Ogle SJ, Davison JG. Age-associated change in pain threshold measured by transcutaneous neuronal electrical stimulation. Age Ageing. 1989; 18:241-6.
-
(1989)
Age Ageing
, vol.18
, pp. 241-246
-
-
Tucker, M.A.1
Andrew, M.F.2
Ogle, S.J.3
Davison, J.G.4
-
15
-
-
0035904362
-
The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients
-
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001; 286:1841-8.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.286
, pp. 1841-1848
-
-
Stiell, I.G.1
Wells, G.A.2
Vandemheen, K.L.3
-
16
-
-
0036633688
-
Trauma: An annotated bibliography of the literature-2001
-
McCabe C, Warren R. Trauma: An annotated bibliography of the literature-2001. Am J Emerg Med. 2002; 20:352-66.
-
(2002)
Am J Emerg Med
, vol.20
, pp. 352-366
-
-
McCabe, C.1
Warren, R.2
-
17
-
-
0027268479
-
How reliable is the digital rectal examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone?
-
Eckardt V, Kanzler G. How reliable is the digital rectal examination for the evaluation of anal sphincter tone? Int J Colorectal Dis 1993; 8:98-7.
-
(1993)
Int J Colorectal Dis
, vol.8
, pp. 98-97
-
-
Eckardt, V.1
Kanzler, G.2
-
18
-
-
0028884362
-
Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer
-
Smith D, Catalona W. Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology. 1995; 45: 70-4.
-
(1995)
Urology
, vol.45
, pp. 70-74
-
-
Smith, D.1
Catalona, W.2
-
19
-
-
0003802343
-
-
New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC
-
Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (eds). Classification and Regression Trees. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1984.
-
(1984)
Classification and Regression Trees
-
-
Breiman, L.1
Friedman, J.2
Olshen, R.3
Stone, C.4
-
20
-
-
0037015999
-
Screening for prostate cancer: Recommendations and rationale
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 137:915-6.
-
(2004)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.137
, pp. 915-916
-
-
-
21
-
-
0037116357
-
Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendations and rationale
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician. 2002; 66:2287-90.
-
(2002)
Am Fam Physician
, vol.66
, pp. 2287-2290
-
-
|