Impact of candidate sire number and sire relatedness on DNA polymorphism-based measures of exclusion probability and probability of unambiguous parentage

Animal Genetics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 220-226

  Sherman, G B ^a,e   Kachman, S D ^a   Hungerford, L L ^a,d   Rupp, G P ^a   Fox, C P ^a   Brown, M D ^a   Feuz, B M ^b   Holm, T R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b MMI Genomics   (United States)

^c MMI Genomics   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Beef; Bull; DNA; Genetic testing; Genetics; Microsatellite; Parentage; Paternity

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; METHODOLOGY; PEDIGREE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROBABILITY;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PEDIGREE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; PROBABILITY;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS; MAMMALIA;

EID: 2942527137     PISSN: 02689146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01143.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bates S., Peterson-Knabe C., Holm T., Van Haeringen H., Lange K., Ziegle J., Heyen D., Da Y., & Lewin H. (1997) Exclusion Probabilities of 22 Bovine Microsatellite Markers in Fluorescent Multiplexes for Automated Parentage Verification (Mimeo). PE Applied Biosystems Technical Report, Foster City, CA.
2. Bertram J.D., Fordyce G., McGowan M.R., Jayawardhama G.A., Fitzpatrick L.A., Doogan V.J., De Faveri J. & Holroyd R.G. (2002) Bull selection and use in northern Australia 3. Serving capacity tests. Animal Reproduction Science 71, 51-66.
3. Chakraborty R., Meagher T.R. & Smouse P.E. (1988) Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118, 527-36.
4. Fleiss J. (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edn. pp. 24-30. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
5. Heyen D.W., Beever J.E., Da Y., Evert R.E., Green C., Bates S.R.E., Ziegle J.S. & Lewin H.A. (1997) Exclusion probabilities of 22 bovine microsatellite markers in fluorescent multiplexes for semi-automated parentage testing. Animal Genetics 28, 21-7.
6. MacCluer J. & Schull W.J. (1963) On the estimation of the frequency of nonpaternity. American Journal of Human Genetics 37, 800-18.
7. Marshall T.C., Slate J., Kruuk L.E. & Pemberton J.M. (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7, 639-55.
8. NAHMS (1997) Part 1: Reference of 1997 Beef Cow-Calf Management Practices. National Animal Health Monitoring System, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
9. Nielsen R., Mattila D.K., Clapham P.J. & Palsbøll P.J. (2001). Statistical approaches to paternity assignment in natural populations and applications to the North American humpback whale. Genetics 157, 1673-82.