Biotechnology and science policy

Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 237-240

  Moses, Vivian ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; EDITORIAL; GENE THERAPY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL ASPECT;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; POLICY MAKING; PUBLIC POLICY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 2942522802     PISSN: 09581669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.05.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. First open debate on GMOs in the Netherlands. URL: http://www.biotech- info.net/open_debate.html.
2. Minister for Food: Agriculture and Fisheries Mariann Fischer Boel: Valuable results in the Agriculture and Fisheries Council (Denmark). URL: http://www.eu2002.dk/news/news_read.asp?iInformationID=26217.
3. Genetic modification - future perspectives for gentle breeding. URL: http://www.levnedsmiddelcentret.dk/old/2002/gmo_1.html.
4. Genetically modified foods: URL: http://special.northernlight.com/ gmfoods/
5. The GMO debate - more heat than light. URL: http://www.fruitgrowers.org. nz/orchardist/articles/1999/07-28.htm.
6. The GMO debate: 12 questions to ask (Philippines). URL: http://www.bwf.org/bk/pamayanan/gmoquestions.html.
7. Gently gently genetics: lessons from the GMO debate (Australia). URL: http://www.atse.org.au/publications/focus/focus-mitchell.htm.
8. De/politicisation of the public in the Czech GMO debate. URL: http://www.cts.cuni.cz/∼pa/docs/stockelova_depolit.pdf.
9. UK GM public debate. URL: http://www.gmpublicdebate.org.uk.
10. Lundin S, Åkesson L: Genetics, genetic engineering and everyday ethics. In Gene Technology and the Public. Edited by Ideland M, Lundin S. Lund: Nordic Academic Press; 1997.
11. Solomon J: Teaching Science, Technology and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1993.
12. Campbell B., Lazonby J., Millar R., Nicolson P., Ramsden J., Waddington D. Science: the Salters' approach - a case study of the process of large scale curriculum development. Sci Educ. 78:1994;415
13. Gardner P. Representations of the relationship between science and technology in the curriculum, studies. Sci Educ. 24:1994;1
14. Black P, Atkin JM (Eds): Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. London: Routledge; 1996.
15. Millar R, Osborne J (Eds): Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future. London: Nuffield Foundation; 1998.
16. Eflin J.T., Glennan S., Reisch G. The nature of science: a perspective from the philosophy of science. J Res Sci Teach. 36:1999;107
17. Kleinman S.S. Overview of feminist perspectives on the ideology of science. J Res Sci Teach. 35:1998;837
18. Reiss MJ: Science Education for a Pluralist Society. Buckingham: Open University Press ;1993.
19. Aikenhead G.S., Jegede A.J. Cross-cultural science education: a cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. J Res Sci Teach. 36:1999;269
20. Reiss MJ: Understanding Science Lessons: Five Years of Science Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
21. Scruggs T.E., Mastropieri M.A., Boon R. Science education for students with disabilities: a review of recent research. Studies Sci Educ. 32:1998;21
22. Toulouse G: Ethics enters the 21st century. Physics World, November 1999:13-14.
23. Wursten H: Allemaal andersdenkenden. In Cultures and Organizations, Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill; 1991.