Reflections on using the Internet for the evaluation of course delivery

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 61-75

  Reid, Ian C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PUBLIC POLICY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS;

COURSE EVALUATION METHODS; FLEXIBLE LEARNING; ONLINE DELIVERY;

INTERNET;

EID: 2942521319     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00048-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ashenden, D., & Milligan, S. (2000). Good universities guide to Australian universities and other higher education institutions. Port Melbourne: Mandarin.
2. Baldwin, G., & James, R. (2000). The market in Australian higher education and the concept of student as informed consumer. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22 (2), 139-148.
3. Bottomley, J. (2000). Reconfiguring institutional strategies for flexible learning and delivery. In: V. Jakupec, & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development: putting theory to work (pp. 87-106). London: Routledge.
4. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
5. Calder, J. (1994). Programme evaluation and quality. London: Kogan Page.
6. Kemp, D. (1999). Quality assured: a new Australian quality assurance framework for university education [online] (Available at: ).
7. King, B. (2000). Managing institutional change and the pressures for new approaches to teaching and learning. In: V. Jakupec, & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development: putting theory to work (pp. 107-129). London: Routledge.
8. Martens, E., & Prosser, M. (1998). What constitutes high quality teaching and learning and how to assure it. Quality Assurance in Education, 6 (1), 28-36.
9. Nunan, T. (2000). Exploring the concept of flexibility. In: V. Jakupec, & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development: putting theory to work (pp. 47-66). London: Routledge.
10. Nunan, T., George, R., & McCausland, H. (2000). Rethinking the ways in which teaching and learning are supported: the flexible learning centre at the University of South Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22 (1), 85-98.
11. Prestoungrange, G., Sandlands E., & Teare R. (Eds.). (2000). The virtual learning organization: learning at the workplace campus. London: Continuum.
12. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching in higher education: the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150.
13. Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.
14. Reid, I. C. (1999). Beyond models: developing a university strategy for online instruction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3 (1).
15. Santhanam, E., Ballantyne, C., Mulligan, D., de la Harpe, B., & Ellis, R. (2000, 2-4 February). Student questionnaires and teaching evaluation: cutting the cloth to fit the purpose. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, Perth.
16. The Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
17. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (1999). Distance learning guidelines [online] (Available at: ).
18. Vroeijenstijn, A. I. (1999). The international dimension in quality assessment and quality assurance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (2), 237-247.