Treatment of contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive barriers

Environmental Geosciences

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 258-265

  Striegel, Jami ^a   Sanders, Dee Ann ^b   Veenstra, John N ^b  

^a Roberts Schornick Associates   (United States)

^b Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater remediation; Passive remediation; Permeable reactive barrier (PRB); Treatment wall

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942518876     PISSN: 10759565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-0984.2001.84004.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Benjamin, M. M. (2002). Water chemistry (PP- 421-430). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. ECHOS (1998). Environmental remediation. Unit cost book/ECHOS, environmental cost handling options and solutions (pp. 8-67-8-70). Kingston, MA: R. S. Means.
3. Evanko, C. R., and Dzombak, D. A. (1997). Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater. Technology Evaluation Report TE-97-101 Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center.
4. Gillham, R. W., and Burris, D. R. (1997). Recent developments in permeable in situ treatment walls for remediation of contaminated groundwater. In C. H. Ward (Ed.), Subsurface restoration (pp. 343-356). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
5. Hem, J. D. (1992). Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water (p. 33). Washington, DC: United States Geological Survey.
6. Palmer, P. L. (1996). Reactive walls. In E. K. Nyer, et al. (Eds.), In situ treatment technology (pp. 271-288). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
7. Powell, R. M. (2000). Powell & Associates Science Services website, www.powellassociates.com.
8. RTDF (1997). Summary of the 1997 Remediation Technologies Development Forum Meeting, Evanston, IL.
9. RTDF (2000). Remediation Technologies Development Forum website, www.rtdf.org,
10. Sawyer, C. N., McCarty, P. L., and Parkin, G. F. (1994). Chemistry for environmental engineering (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 154-165.
11. Testa, S. M., and Winegardner, D. L. (2000). Restoration of petroleum contaminated aquifers: Petroleum hydrocarbons and organic compounds (2nd ed., pp. 212-214). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12. USEPA (1995). In situ remediation technology status report: Treatment walls. EPA/542/K-94/004. Washington, DC: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Technology Innovation Office.
13. USEPA (1997a). Permeable reactive subsurface barriers for the interception and remediation of chlorinated hydrocarbon and chromium (VI) plumes in groundwater. EPA/600/F-97/008. Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory.
14. USEPA (1997b). Permeable reactive barriers action team. EPA/ 542/F-97/012c. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Research and Development, Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
15. USEPA. (1998). Permeable reactive barrier technologies for contaminant remediation. Titles for Exhibits, PRB Paper EPA/600/R-98/125. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.