Hydrologic resilience of the terrestrial biosphere

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 32, Issue 21, 2005, Pages 1-4

  Gerten, Dieter ^a   Lucht, Wolfgang ^a   Schaphoff, Sibyll ^a   Cramer, Wolfgang ^a   Hickler, Thomas ^b   Wagner, Wolfgang ^c  

^a POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF; ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; WATER;

ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE EFFECTS; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS (GCMS); TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE;

CLIMATOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION;

EID: 29344465772     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005GL024247     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. 2] in relation to the global carbon cycle, Global Change Biol., 1, 243-274.
2. Arnell, N. W. (2004), Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios, Global Environ. Change, 14, 31-52.
3. Ciais, P., et al. (2005), Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003, Nature, 437, 529-533.
4. Fekete, B. M., C. J. Vörösmarty, and W. Grabs (1999), Global composite runoff fields of observed river discharge and simulated water balances, Rep. 22, Global Runoff Data Cent., Koblenz, Germany.
5. Gerten, D., S. Schaphoff, U. Haberlandt, W. Lucht, and S. Sitch (2004), Terrestrial vegetation and water balance: Hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model, J. Hydrol., 286, 249-270.
6. Long, S. P., E. A. Ainsworth, A. Rogers, and D. R. Ort (2004), Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: Plants FACE the future, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 55, 591-628.
7. Manabe, S., P. C. D. Milly, and R. Wetherald (2004), Simulated long-term changes in river discharge and soil moisture due to global warming, Hydrol. Sci. J., 49, 625-642.
8. Nemani, R., M. White, P. Thornton, K. Nishida, S. Reddy, J. Jenkins, and S. Running (2002), Recent trends in hydrologic balance have enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink in the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(10), 1468, doi:10.1029/2002GL014867.
9. Nemani, R., C. D. Keeling, H. Hashimoto, W. M. Jolly, S. C. Piper, C. J. Tucker, R. B. Myneni, and S. W. Running (2003), Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999, Science, 300, 1560-1563.
10. New, M., M. Hulme, and P. Jones (2000), Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. part II: Development of 1901-1996 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate, J. Clim., 13, 2217-2238.
11. Prentice, I. C., M. Heimann, and S. Sitch (2000), The carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere: Ecosystem models and atmospheric observations, Ecol. Appl., 10, 1553-1573.
12. Schaphoff, S., W. Lucht, D. Gerten, S. Sitch, W. Cramer, and I. C. Prentice (2005), Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections, Clim. Change, in press.
13. Sitch, S., et al. (2003), Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Change Biol., 9, 161-185.
14. Stephenson, N. L. (1990), Climatic control of vegetation distribution: The role of the water balance, Am. Nat., 135, 649-670.
15. Valentini, R. (Ed.) (2003), Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests, 260 pp., Springer, New York.
16. Wagner, W., K. Scipal, C. Pathe, D. Gerten, W. Lucht, and B. Rudolf (2003), Evaluation of the agreement between the first global remotely sensed soil moisture data with model and precipitation data, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D19), 4611, doi:10.1029/2003JD003663.