DD-PREF: A language for expressing preferences over sets

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 620-626

  Desjardins, Marie ^a   Wagstaff, Kiri L ^b  

^a University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FUNCTIONS;

APPLICATION DOMAINS; DATA SET; GREEDY ALGORITHM; HIGH-QUALITY IMAGE SUBSETS;

SET THEORY;

EID: 29344443107     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Ali, K., and van Stam, W. 2004. TiVo: Making show recommendations using a distributed collaborative filtering architecture. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 394-401. ACM Press.
2. Barberà, S.; Bessert, W.; and Pattanaik, P. K. 2004. Ranking sets of objects. In Barberà, S.; Hammond, P. J.; and Seidl, C., eds., Handbook of Utility Theory, volume 2: Extensions. Springer. Chapter 17.
3. Boutilier, C.; Brafman, R. I.; Domshlak, C.; Hoos, H.; and Poole, D. 2004. CP-Nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. Journal of AI Research 21:135-191.
4. Boutilier, C. 2002. Solving concisely expressed combinatorial auction problems. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 359-366.
5. Burke, R. 2002. Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4):331-370.
6. Castaño, R.; Wagstaff, K.; Song, L.; and Anderson, R. C. 2005. Validating rover image prioritizations. The Interplanetary Network Progress Report 42(160).
7. Crammer, K., and Singer, Y. 2001. Pranking with ranking. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 641-647.
8. Cramton, P.; Shoham, Y.; and Steinberg, R., eds. 2005. Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press.
9. Domshlak, C.; Brafman, R. I.; and Shimony, S. E. 2001. Preference-based configuration of web page content. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1451-1456.
10. Nisan, N. 2000. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1-12.
11. Ziegler, C.-N.; McNee, S. M.; Konstan, J. A.; and Lausen, G. 2005. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web Conference. In press.