A probabilistic classification approach for lexical textual entailment

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2005, Pages 1050-1055

  Glickman, Oren ^a   Dagan, Ido ^a   Koppel, Moshe ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; TEXT PROCESSING; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

SEMANTIC INFERENCE; TEXT CATEGORIZATION; TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 29344441763     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Barzilay, R. and McKeown, K. 2001. Extracting Paraphrases from a Parallel Corpus. ACL, pp. 50-57.
2. Califf, M. E. and Mooney, R. J. 2003. Bottom-Up Relational Learning of Pattern Matching Rules for Information Extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 4, pp. 177-210.
3. Chierchia, G, and McConnell-Ginet, S. 2001. Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics, MIT Press.
4. Condoravdi, C.; Crouch, D.; de Paiva, V.; Stolle, R.; Bobrow, D. G. 2003. Entailment, Intensionality and Text Understanding. HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Text Meaning.
5. Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge. In Proceedings of the PASCAL Challenges Workshop for Recognizing Textual Entailment. Southampton, U.K.
6. Harabagiu, S. M.; Moldovan, D. I.; Pasca, M.; Mihalcea, R.; Surdeanu, M.; Bunescu, R. C.; Girju, R.; Rus, V.; Morarescu, P. 2000. FALCON: Boosting Knowledge for Answer Engines. The ninth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9).
7. Hobbs, J. R.; Stickel, M. E.; Appelt, D. E.; Martin, P. 1993. Interpretation as Abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63: 69-142.
8. Hovy, E. H.; Hermjakob, U.; Lin. 2001. The Use of External Knowledge in Factoid QA. TREC-10.
9. Landis, R. J. and Koch, G. G. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
10. Lin, D. and Pantel, P. 2001. Discovery of Inference Rules for Question Answering. Natural Language Engineering 7:4.
11. McCallum, A. and Nigam, K. 1998. A Comparison of Event Models for Naive Bayes Text Classification. AAAI-98 Workshop on "Learning for Text Categorization".
12. Moldovan, D. I. and Rus, V. 2001. Logic Form Transformation of WordNet and its Applicability to Question Answering. ACL.
13. Monz, C. and de Rijke, M. 2001. Light-Weight Entailment Checking for Computational Semantics. The third workshop on inference in computational semantics (ICoS-3).
14. Nie, J.Y. and Brisebois, M. 1996. An Inferential Approach to Information Retrieval and Its Implementation Using a Manual Thesaurus. Artificial Intelligence Revue 10(5-6): 409-439.
15. Nigam, K; McCallum, A.; Thrun, S.; Mitchell, T. 2000. Text Classification from Labeled and Unlabeled Documents using EM. Machine Learning, 39(2/3). pp. 103-134.
16. Rose, T. G.; Stevenson, M.; Whitehead, M. 2002. The Reuters Corpus volume 1 - from yester-day's news to tomorrow's language resources. Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-02).
17. Horacio Saggion, Rob Gaizauskas, Mark Hepple, Ian Roberts and Mark A. Greenwood. 2004. Exploring the Performance of Boolean Retrieval Strategies For Open Domain Question Answering. In Proceedings of the Information Retrieval for Question Answering (IR4QA) Workshop at SIGIR 2004.
18. Szpektor, I; Tanev, H; Dagan, I; Coppola B. 2004. Scaling Web-based Acquisition of Entailment Relations. EMNLP.