Motion recovery by integrating over the joint image manifold

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 131-145

  Goshen, Liran ^a   Shimshoni, Ilan ^a   Anandan, P ^b   Keren, Daniel ^c  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Epipolar geometry estimation; Fundamental matrix estimation; Integrated maximum likelihood; Motion recovery

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; ESTIMATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOTION COMPENSATION;

EPIPOLAR GEOMETRY ESTIMATION; FUNDAMENTAL MATRIX ESTIMATION; INTEGRATED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MOTION RECOVERY;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 29344434750     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-005-3673-2     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Ahn, S.J., Rauh, W., and Warnecke, H.J. 2001. Least-squares orthogonal distances fitting of circle, sphere, ellipse, hyperbola, and parabola. Pattern Recognition, 34(12):2283-2303.
2. Anandan, P. and Avidan, S. 2000. Integrating local affine into global projective images in the joint image space. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 907-921.
3. Berger, J., Liseo, B., and Wolpert, R. 1999. Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Statistical Science, 14(1):1-28.
4. Bruckstein, A.M., Holt, R.J., Jean, Y.D., and Netravali, A.N. 2001. On the use of shadows in pose recovery. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology, 11:315-330.
5. Faugeras, O.D. 1992. What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig? In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 563-578.
6. Faugeras, O.D., Luong, Q.T., and Maybank, S.J. 1992. Camera self-calibration: Theory and experiments. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 321-334.
7. Forsyth, D.A., loffe, S., and Haddon, J. 1999. Bayesian structure from motion. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 660-665.
8. Goshen, L., Shimshoni, I., Anandan, P., and Keren, D. 2003. Recovery of epipolar geometry as a manifold fitting problem. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1321-1328.
9. Harris, C. and Stephens, M.J. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Proc. of Alvey Vis. Conf., pp. 147-152.
10. Hartley, R.I. 1992. Estimation of relative camera positions for uncalibrated cameras. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 579-587.
11. Hartley, R.I., Gupta, R., and Chang, T. 1992. Stereo from uncalibrated cameras. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Comp. Vision Patt. Recog., pp. 761-764.
12. Hartley, R.I. and Zisserman, A. 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, Cambridge.
13. Kanatani, K. 1993. Geometric computation for machine vision. In Oxford University Press.
14. Kanatani, K. 1994. Statistical-analysis of geometric computation. Comp. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 59(3):286-306.
15. Kanatani, K. 1994. Statistical bias of conic fitting and renormalization. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 16(3):320-326.
16. Kanatani, K. 1996. Statistical Optimization for Geometric Computation: Theory and Practice. North-Holland.
17. Keren, D., Cooper, D., and Subrahmonia, J. 1994. Describing complicated objects by implicit polynomials. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 16:38-53.
18. Keren, D., Shimshoni, I., Goshen, L., and Werman, M. 2003. All points considered: A maximum likelihood method for motionrecovery. In Theoretical Foundations of Computer Vision, pp. 72-85.
19. Leedan, Y. and Meer, P. 2000. Heteroscedastic regression in computer vision: Problems with bilinear constraint. International Journal of Computer Vision, 37(2):127-150.
20. Longuet-Higgins, H.C. 1981. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293:133-135.
21. Nestares, O., Fleet, D.J., and Heeger, D.J. 2000. Likelihood functions and confidence bounds for total-least-squares problems. In Proceedings, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. I:523-530.
22. Nestares, O. and Fleet, D.J. 2003. Error-in-variables likelihood functions for motion estimation. In International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. III-77-80.
23. Newsam, G. and Redding, N. 1997. Fitting the most probable curve to noisy observations. In International Conference on Image Processing, pp. II:752-755.
24. Ohta, N. 2003. Motion parameter estimation from optical flow without nuisance parameters. In Third IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision.
25. Okatani, T. and Deguchi, K. 2002. Is there room for improving estimation accuracy of the structure and motion problem? In Proc. Statistical Methods in Video Processing Workshop, pp. 25-30.
26. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. 1986. Numerical Recipes. Cambridge University Press.
27. Sampson, P.D. 1982. Fitting conic sections to 'very scattered' data: An iterative refinement of the bookstein algorithm. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 18:97-108.
28. Severini, T.A. 2001. Likelihood Methods in Statistics. Oxford University Press.
29. Sullivan, S., Sandford, L., and Ponce, J. 1994. Using geometric distance fits for 3D object modeling and recognition. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(12):1183-1196.
30. Taubin, G., Cukierman, F., Sullivan, S., Ponce, J., and Kriegman, D.J. 1994. Parameterized families of polynomials for bounded algebraic curve and surface fitting. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 16(3):287-303.
31. Torr, P.H.S. 2002. Bayesian model estimation and selection for epipolar geometry and generic manifold fitting. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50(1):35-61.
32. Torr, P.H.S. and Zisserman, A. 1998. Concerning bayesian motion segmentation, model averaging, matching and the trifocal tensor. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 511-527.
33. Triggs, B. 1995. Matching constraints and the joint image. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 338-343.
34. Weng, J., Huang, T.S., and Ahuja, N. 1989. Motion and structure from two perspective views: Algorithms, error analysis, and error estimation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 11(5):451-476.
35. Werman, M. and Keren, D. 2001. A Bayesian method for fitting parametric and nonparametric models to noisy data. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 23(5):528-534.