|
|
|
Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 291-328
|
|
Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;
PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT;
ARTICLE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FORD V. WAINWRIGHT;
FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LOUISIANA V. PERRY;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PRISONER;
PSYCHOSIS;
PUNISHMENT;
RIGGINS V. NEVADA;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WASHINGTON V. HARPER;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FORD V. WAINWRIGHT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LOUISIANA V. PERRY;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
RIGGINS V. NEVADA;
WASHINGTON V. HARPER;
ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS;
ARKANSAS;
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT;
COERCION;
HUMANS;
INSANITY DEFENSE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
PRISONERS;
PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS;
PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
|
|
EID: 29244490915
PISSN: 00426229
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (10)
|
|
References (0)
|
