Hurricane Charley and changing vulnerability: An analysis of spatial and temporal changes

Florida Geographer

Volumn , Issue 36, 2005, Pages 6-22

  Montz, Burrell ^a   Blackman, Valerie ^b   Halupke, Leyla ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Geological Sciences and Environmental Studies ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HURRICANE; NATURAL DISASTER; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29244474084     PISSN: 07390041     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., and Wisner, B. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. London: Routledge.
2. Bolin, R.C. and Klenow, D.J. 1982-1983. Response of the elderly to disaster: an age stratified analysis. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 16: 283-296.
3. Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G.A. and Montz, B.E. 2005. Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geo-physical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review 6: 23-33.
4. Clark, G.E., Moser, S.C., Ratick, S.J., Dow, K., Meyer, W.B., Emani, S., Jin, W., Kasperson, J.X., Kasperson, R.E., and Schwarz, H.E. 1998. Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3: 59-82.
5. Cutter, S.L., Mitchell, J.T., and Scott, M.S. 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4): 713-737.
6. Ellen, E.F. 2001. The elderly may have advantage in natural disasters. Psychiatric Times XVII(1).
7. Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, Singapore: Longman.
8. Hodgson, M.E. and Palm, R. 1992. Attitude and response to earthquake hazards: A GIS design for analyzing risk assessment. Geographic Information Systems 2(7): 40-51.
9. Insurance Information Institute. 2004. The Ten Most Costly Hurricanes in the United States. http://www.iii.org/media/hottopics/additional/florida/ Last acceded December 27, 2004.
10. King, D. 2001. Uses and limitations of socioeconomic indicators of community vulnerability to natural hazards: data and disasters in Northern Australia. Natural Hazards 24(2): 147-156.
11. Mejia-Navarro, M., Wohl, E.E. and Oaks, S.D. 1994. Geological hazards, vulnerability, and risk assessment using GIS: model for Glenwood Springs, Colorado. In Morisawa, M. (ed.) Geomorphology and Natural Hazards. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 331-354.
12. Montz, B.E. and Tobin, G.A. 1998. Hazardousness of location: critical facilities in the Tampa Bay region. Papers and Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences 21: 315-322.
13. Montz, B.E. and Tobin, G.A. 2003. Hazardousness of the Tampa region: evaluating physical risk and socio-economic vulnerability. Papers of the Applied Geography Conferences 26: 380-388.
14. Pasch, R. J., Brown, D. P., & Blake, E. S. 2004. Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Charley. http:www.nhc.noaa.gov/2004charley.shtml.
15. Sanders, S., Bowie, S. and Bowie Dias, Y. 2003. Lesson learned on forced relocation of older adults: the impact of Hurricane Andrew on health, mental health, and social support of public housing residents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work. 40(4).
16. Thomas, N. and Soliman, H. 2002. Preventable tragedies: heat disaster and the elderly. Journal of Gerontological Social Work 38(4): 53-66.
17. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. Florida Quick Facts. http:// quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/12000.html. Last accessed 12/17/04.
18. Winsberg, M., Zierden, D.F., and O'Brian, J.J. no date. Climate of Florida. http://www.coaps.fsu.edu/climate_center/FLClimate.htm. Last accessed 12/17/04