A combined hydrologic simulation and landscape design model to prioritize sites for wetlands restoration

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 251-263

  Newbold, Stephen C ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrologic simulation modeling; Non point source pollution; Optimal landscape design; Reserve site selection; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; RESTORATION; SITE SELECTION;

HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION MODEL; HYDROLOGIC SIMULATIONS; LANDSCAPE DESIGN; NITROGEN ATTENUATION; NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION; RESTORATION SITES; RESTORED WETLANDS; WETLANDS RESTORATION;

WETLANDS;

DESIGN METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; WETLAND;

CALIFORNIA; CENTRAL VALLEY [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29244463314     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-005-9002-x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. J.C. Williams and C.S. ReVelle, Introduction to the special issue, Environ. Model. Assess. 7 (2002) 57-59.
2. H.J. Greenberg, Mathematical programming models for environmental quality control, Oper. Res. 43(4) (1995) 578-622.
3. C. ReVelle, Research challenges in environmental management, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 121 (2000) 218-231.
4. M.A. Clemens, C.S. ReVelle and J.C. Williams, Reserve design for species preservation, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 112 (1999) 273-283.
5. F.W. Davis, D.M. Stoms, R.L. Church, W.J. Okin and K.N. Johnson, Selecting biodiversity management areas, in: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report To Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options (Davis, University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, 1996).
6. D. Tilman, Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, in: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, eds. G.C. Daily (Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1997).
7. D.A. Wardle, M.A. Huston, J.P. Grime, F. Berendse, E. Garnier, W.K. Lauenroth, H. Setala and S.D. Wilson, Biodiversity and ecosystem function: an issue in ecology, Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 81(3) (2000) 232-235.
8. A.P. Kinzig, S.W. Pacala and D. Tilman, eds. The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Emprical Progress and Theoretical Extensions, (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 2002).
9. J.B. Loomis and D.S. White, Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ. 18(3) (1996) 197-206.
10. S.C. Newbold, Integrated modeling for watershed management: multiple objectives and spatial effects, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 38(2) (2002) 341-353.
11. National Research Council Committee on Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1992).
12. W.J. Mitsch and R.F. Wilson, Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design, Ecol. Appl. 6(1) (1996) 77-83.
13. W.J. Mitsch, Landscape design and the role of created, restored, and natural riparian wetlands in controlling nonpoint source pollution, Ecol. Eng. 1 (1992) 27-47.
14. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Protecting and Restoring America's Watersheds: Status, Trends, and Initiatives in Watershed Management. Office of Water. EPA-840-R-00-001, 2001.
15. J.B. Hyman and S.G. Leibowitz, A general framework for prioritizing land units for ecological protection and restoration, Environ. Manage. 25(1) (2000) 23-35.
16. A. Ando, J. Camm, S. Polasky and A. Solow, Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation, Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128.
17. M.I. Westphal and H.P. Possingham, Applying a decision-theory framework to landscape planning for biodiversity: follow-up to Watson et al., Conserv. Biol. 17(1) (2003) 327-329.
18. R.G. Haight, B. Cypher, P.A. Kelly, S. Phillips, H.P. Possingham and K. Ralls, Optimizing reserve expansion for disjunct populations of San Joaquin kit fox, Biol. Conserv. 117(1) (2004) 61-72.
19. M.I. Westphal, M. Pickett, W.M. Getz and H.P. Possingham, The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations, Ecol. Appl. 13(2) (2003) 543-555.
20. J. Hof and M. Bevers, Spatial Optimization for Managed Ecosystems (Columbia University Press, New York, 1998).
21. J. Hof and M. Bevers, Spatial Optimization in Ecological Applications (Columbia University Press, New York, 2002).
22. H. Possingham, I. Ball and S. Andelman, 2002. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks, in: Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology, eds. S. Ferson and M. Burgman (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002).
23. D.E. Calkin, C.A. Montgomery, N.H. Schumaker, S. Polasky, J.L. Arthur and D.J. Nalle, Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value, Can. J. For. Res. 32 (2002) 1329-1342.
24. H.P. Possingham, Decision theory and biodiversity management: how to manage a metapopulation. in: Frontiers of Population Ecology, eds. R.B. Floyd, A.W. Sheppard and P.J. DeBarro (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1996).
25. S.P. Hubbell, The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 2001).
26. L.G. Underhill, Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms, Biol. Conserv. 70 (1994) 85-87.
27. R.L. Pressey, H.P. Possingham and C.R. Margules, Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much?, Biol. Conserv. 76 (1996) 259-267.
28. G.B. Dantzig, Discrete-variable extremum problems, Oper. Res. 5(2) (1957) 266-277.
29. S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt Jr. and M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983) 671-680.
30. Z. Michalewicz and D.B. Fogel, How to Solve It: Modern Heuristics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000).
31. P. Fenesta and M.G.C. Resende, GRASP: An annotated bibliography. AT&T Labs Research Technical Report: 0.0.1.1., 2000.
32. National Research Council, Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1992).
33. W.J. Mitsch and J.G. Gosselink, Wetlands, 2nd edn (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1993).
34. W.M. Lewis, Jr. Wetlands Explained: Wetland Science, Policy, and Politics in America (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).
35. D.F. Whigham, C. Chitterling and B. Palmer, Impacts of freshwater wetlands on water quality: a landscape perspective, Environ. Manage. 12(5) (1988) 663-671.
36. C.A. Johnston, Sediment and nutrient retention by freshwater wetlands: effects on surface water quality, Crit. Rev. Environ. Control 21(5-6) (1991) 491-565.
37. J.W. Gilliam, Riparian wetlands and water quality, J. Environ. Qual. 23(5) (1994) 896-900.
38. P.D. Jenssen, T. Maehlum, R. Roseth, B. Braskerud, N. Syversen, A. Njos and T. Krogstad, The potential of natural ecosystem self-purifying measures for controlling nutrient inputs, Mar. Pollut. Bull. 29(6-12) (1994) 420-425.
39. R.H. Kadlec and R.L. Knight, Treatment Wetlands (Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1996).
40. C.A. Johnston, N.E. Detenbeck and G.J. Niemi, The cumulative effects of wetlands on stream water quality and quantity: a landscape approach, Biogeochemistry 10 (1990) 105-141.
41. N.E. Detenbek, C.A. Johnston and G.J. Niemi, Wetland effects on lake water quality in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan area, Landsc. Ecol. 8(1) (1993) 39-61.
42. Committee on Characterization of Wetlands, Wetlands: Characteristics and Boundaries (National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1995).
43. S. Openshaw and P.J. Taylor, The modifiable areal unit problem, in: Quantitative Geography: A British View, eds. N. Wrigley (Routledge and Regan Paul, London, 1981).
44. http://cdec.water.ca.gov/
45. R.A. Corbitt, Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1990).
46. W. Viessman Jr., G.L. Lewisa and J.W. Knapp, Introduction to Hydrology, 3rd edn (Harper Collins Publishers, New York, 1989).
47. D.A. Goldhamer and R.L. Snyder, Irrigation scheduling: a guide for efficient on-farm water management (University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, publication 21454, 1989).
48. See http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tigerua/ua_tgr2k.html, and coverages in e:/wetlands/masterarcviewproject.prj.
49. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Nationwide Evaluation of Combined Sewer Overflows and Urban Stormwater Discharges, Volume 1: Executive summary 1977. Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, (U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH, 1977).
50. http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/landwateruse/landuse/ludataindex.htm.
51. http://wetlands.fws.gov/index.html.
52. L.B. Owens, R.W. Van Keuren and W.M. Edwards, Budgets of non-nitrogen nutrients in a high fertility pasture system, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 70 (1998) 7-18.
53. M. Padgitt, D. Newton, R. Penn and C. Sandretto, Production practices for major crops in U.S agriculture, 1990-97. (Resource economics division, Economic Research Service, USDA; http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb969/sb969c.pdf, 2000).
54. U.S.D.A. Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, 2000. Economic Research Service, Natural Resources and Environment Division, (2000)
55. R.L. Pressey and R.M. Cowling, Reserve selection algorithms and the real world, Conserv. Biol. 15(1) (2001) 275-277.