The pendulum effect: Explaining shifts in the democratic response to terrorism

Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 223-233

  Matthew, Richard ^a,c,d,e   Shambaugh, George ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Center for Unconventional Security Affairs   (United States)

^d Global Environmental Change and Human Security Research Office   (United States)

^e Global Environmental Change and Human Security Research Office ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; POLITICAL PROCESS; TERRORISM;

EID: 29244457251     PISSN: 15297489     EISSN: 15302415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2005.00068.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander, Y., & Gleason, J. (Eds.). (1981). Behavioral and quantitative perspectives on terrorism. New York: Pergamon.
2. Anonymous. (2004). American hubris: Why the West is losing the war on terror. Washington, DC: Brassey's.
3. Aristotle. (1959). Politics. London: J. M. Dent.
4. Chomsky, N. (2002). 9-11. New York: Metropolitan Books.
5. st century. Political Psychology, 27, 405-419.
6. Doyle, M. (1983). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs, parts 1 and 2. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, 205-235, 323-353.
7. Gallup Organization (2002-2004). Survey question: Most important problem facing the nation today. Retrieved June 17, 2005, from http://www.gallup.com/ poll/content/default.aspx?ci=14338.
8. Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
10. Hudson, R. (1999). The sociology and psychology of terrorism: Who becomes a terrorist and why? Washington, DC: Library of Congress Report.
11. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Locke, J. (1963). Two treatises of government. New York: New American Library.
13. Locke, J. (1983). A letter concerning toleration. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
14. Matthew, R. (2002). Dichotomy of power: Nation versus state in world politics. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
15. Matthew, R., & Shambaugh, G. (1998). Sex, drags and heavy metal: Transnational threats and national vulnerabilities. Security Dialogue, 29(2), 163-176.
16. Norton, A. (1988). Reflections on political identity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17. Norton, A. (1993). Republic of signs: Liberal theory and American popular culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Poggi, G. (1978). The development of the modern state: A sociological perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Sandel, M. (1982, rev. 1997). Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Shambaugh, G., & Josiger, W. (2004, October). Public prudence, the policy salience of terrorism and presidential approval following terrorist incidents. Paper presented at the Annual Joint Conference - 2004, International Security and Arms Control Section of the American Political Science Association, International Security Studies Section of the International Studies Association, Women in International Security, Washington, DC.
23. Shepsle, K., & Bonchek, M. (1997). Analyzing politics: Rationality, behavior and institutions. New York: W.W. Norton.
24. Small, M., & Singer, J. (1976). The war-proneness of democratic regimes. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 1, 50-69.
25. Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and the causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.
26. Strayer, J. (1970). On the medieval origins of the modern state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27. Thucydides. (1954). The Peloponnesian war. Harmondswoith, UK: Penguin2E
28. Zacher, M., & Matthew, R. (1995). Liberal international theory: Common threads, divergent strands. In C. Kegley (Ed.), Controversies in international relations theory: Realism and the neo-liberal challenge (pp. 107-150). New York: St. Martin's Press.