A comparison of fixed-site and non-fixed-site approaches for species protection

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 229-238

  Nalle, Darek J ^a   Arthur, Jeffrey L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest certification; Forestry; Land use; Landscape ecology; Nature reserve design; Operations research; Resource economics; Species conservation

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; LAND USE; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

DEGREE OF PROTECTION; FOREST CERTIFICATION; INTEGRATED OPTIMIZATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; NATURE RESERVES; PROTECTION STRATEGY; RESOURCE EXTRACTION; SPECIES CONSERVATIONS;

CONSERVATION;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SPECIES CONSERVATION;

OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 29244448679     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-005-9004-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. A. Ando, J. Camm, S. Polasky and A. Solow, Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation, Science 279 (1998) 2126-2128.
2. D.M. Adams, R.A. Schillinger, G. Latta and A. VanNalts, Timber Harvest Projections for Private Land in Western Oregon, Research Contribution 37 (Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2002) http://www.cof.orst.edu/cof/fr/ people/westor/.
3. P. Adamus, Terrestrial Vertebrate Species of the Willamette River Basin: A Species-Habitat Relationship Matrix and Spatial Modeling Approach, Database Appendix (US EPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, 2000).
4. R.A. Briers, Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures, Biol. Conserv. 103 (2002) 77-83.
5. Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Atlantic Stock Assessment Secretariat, Report on the Status of Groundfish Stocks in the Canadian Northwest Atlantic, (1994).
6. K.D. Cocks and I.A. Baird, Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Pennisula, South Australia, Biol. Conserv. 49 (1989) 113-130.
7. W.B. Cohen, T.A. Spies and M. Fiorella, Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, USA, Int. J. Remote Sens. 16 (1995) 721-746.
8. F. Glover, Tabu search - part I, J. Comput. 1 (1989) 190-260.
9. F. Glover, Tabu search - part II, J. Comput. 2 (1989) 4-32.
10. D.W. Hann, A.S. Hester and C.L. Olson, ORGANNON User's Manual: Edition 6.0 (Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 1997).
11. J. Hof and M.G. Raphael, Optimization of habitat placement: a case study of the northern spotted owl in the Olympic Peninsula, Ecol. Appl. 7 (1997) 1160-1169.
12. J. Hof and M. Bevers, Spatial Optimization for Managed Ecosystems (Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1998).
13. J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial and Systems (University of Michigan Press, Arm Arbor, MI, 1975).
14. S. Kirkpatrick, C. Gelatt and M. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983) 671-680.
15. MATLAB, v5.3 (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, 1999).
16. M.E. McDill and J. Braze, Comparing adjacency constraint formulations for randomly generated forest planning problems with four age-class distributions, For. Sci. 46 (2000) 423-436.
17. N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller and E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953) 1087-1092.
18. A. Murray and R. Church, Heuristic solution approaches to operational forest planning problems, OR Spektrum 17 (1995) 193-203.
19. A. Murray and R. Church, Analyzing cliques for imposing adjacency restrictions in forest models, For. Sci. 42 (1996) 166-175.
20. D.J. Nalle, Optimizing Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Nature Reserve Design Under Economic and Ecological Objectives, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2002).
21. D.J. Nalle, J.L. Arthur, C.A. Montgomery and J. Sessions, Economic and spatial impacts of an existing reserve network on future augmentation, Environ. Model. Assess. 7 (2002) 99-105.
22. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife List of Sensitive Species, (1997), http://www.dfw.state.or.us/ODFWhtml/InfoCntrWild/ Diversity/senspecies.pdf
23. Pacific Northwest Ecosystem Research Consortium, Willamette River Basin Atlas: Trajectories of Environmental and Ecological Change (Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, 2001).
24. S. Polasky, J. Camm and B. Garber-Yonts, Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon, Land Econ. 77 (2001) 68-78.
25. R.L. Pressey and K.H. Taffs, Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplacibility and vulnerability to vegetation loss, Biol. Conserv. 100 (2001) 355-376.
26. C.F. Row, F. Kaiser, J. Sessions, Discount rate for long-term Forest Service investments, J. For. 79 (1981) 367-369, 376.
27. N.H. Schumaker, EPA/600/R-98/135 (1998).
28. J. Sessions, D. Johnson, J. Ross and B. Sharer, The Blodgett plan, a non-reserve based landscape approach to developing mature forest habitat, J. For. 98 (2000) 29-33.
29. S.A. Snyder and C.S. ReVelle, Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions: the share model, For. Sci. 43 (1997) 213-222.
30. S.A. Snyder and C.S. ReVelle, Multiobjective grid packing problem: an application in forest management, Location Sci. 5 (1997) 165-180.
31. J.W. Thomas, Team Leader, Forest Ecosystem Management: an Ecological, Economic, and Social Assessment. (U.S. Government Printing Office, Document 1993- 793-071 Washington, D.C., 1993)
32. J.C. Williams and C.S. ReVelle, A 0-1 programming approach to delineating protected reserves. Environ. Plann., B 23 (1996) 607-624.
33. J.C. Williams and C.S. ReVelle, Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 104 (1998) 497-509.