Influences on cooperation in BitTorrent communities

Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2005 Workshops: Conference on Computer Communications

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 111-115

  Andrade, Nazareno ^a   Mowbray, Miranda ^b   Lima, Aliandro ^a   Wagner, Gustavo ^a   Ripeanu, Matei ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINA GRANDE   (Brazil)

^b HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

BitTorrent; Cooperation; P2P

Indexed keywords

BITTORRENT; COOPERATION; P2P;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 29244442923     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. E. Adar and B. Huberman. Free Riding on Gnutella. First. Monday, 5(10), Octobur 2000.
2. A. Bharambe, V. Padmanabhan, und C. Herley. Understanding and Deconstructing BitTorrent Performance. In ACM SIGMETRICS, June 2005. http://www.research.microsoft.com/pad~manab/papers/msr-tr-2005-03.ps.
3. BitTorrent, Inc. BitTorrent web site, 2001-2005. http://www.bittorrent. com.
4. J. Bond. RSS FAQ. http://www.voidstar.com/module.php? id= 129&mod=book&op=feed.
5. CacheLogic. The true picture of peer-to-poor filesharing. http://www.cachelogic.com/research, July 2004.
6. B. Cohen. Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent. In Proc. Workshop on, Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, Berkeley CA, USA, June 2003.
7. M. Feldman, K. Lai, J. Chuang, and I. Stoica. Quantifying disincentives in poor-to-peer networks. In Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Pear Systems, June 2003.
8. P. R. Hinton. Statistics Explained. Rontledge, 2004.
9. D. Hughes, G. Coulson, and J. Waikerdine. Freeriding on Gnutella Revisited: the Bell Tolls? IEEE Distributed Systems Online, 6(6), 2005. http://dsonline.computer.org/portal/pages/dsouline/0506/06001. html.
10. M. Izal, G. Urvoy-Keller, E. W. Biersack, P. Felber, A. A. Hamra, and L. Garcés-Erice. Dissecting BitTorrent: Five Months in a Torrent's Lifetime. In Proc. Passive and Active Measurements (PAM2004), Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, April 2004.
11. Jupiter (Easytree Chief Moderator). Personal communication, March 2005.
12. Monkey Methods research group. Monkeyin' around: Is BitTorront dead? http://monkeymethods.org/pubs/isbittorrent-dead-centralization-aualysis.htm, Jan. 2005.
13. J. Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D. Epema, and H. Sips. The Bittorrent P2P File-sharing System: Measurements and Analysis. In 4th International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS'05), Feb. 2005. http://www.st.ewi.tudelft.nl/ ~pouwelse/Bittorrent.Measurerments_6pages.pdf.
14. D. Qiu and R. Srikant. Modeling and performance analysis of BitTorrent-like peer-to-peer networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, 34(4):367-367, Oct. 2004. http://www.ifp.uiuc.edu/~dqiu/paper/ bittorrent.pdf.
15. S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, and S. D. Gribble. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Proc. Multimedia Computing and Networking 2002 (MMCN '02), San Jose CA, USA, January 2002. http://www.cs.washington.edu/ homes/gribble/papers/mmcn.pdf.
16. M. J. Wielaard. The Hunting of the Snark Project - BitTorrent Application Suite, http://www.klomp.org/snark/, 2003.
17. Wikipedia. Bootleg recording. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Bootleg_recording, 2005.
18. M. Yang, Z. Zhang, X. Li, and Y. Dai. An empirical study of free-riding behavior in the Maze P2P file-sharing system. In IPTPS '05, Feb. 2005.