Writing up qualitative research

Families in Society

Volumn 86, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 589-593

  Drisko, James W ^a  

^a SMITH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244435034     PISSN: 10443894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1606/1044-3894.3465     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Anastas, J. ( 2000). Research design for social work and the human services (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Caputo, R. (2004). Advice for those wanting to publish quantitative research. Families in Society, 85, 401-405.
3. Conboy, A. (1998). Personal communications and a series of e-mail communications regarding the use of evaluative criteria by a class of doctoral social work students at Yeshiva University's Wurzweiler School of Social Work.
4. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Drisko, J. (2005, January). Using images, sound and video in research: The tools are available now! Juried workshop presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work & Research Annual Meeting, Miami, FL.
6. Drisko, J. (2003, January). Improving sampling strategies and terminology in qualitative research. Juried paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work and Research, Washington, DC.
7. Drisko, J. (1999, January). Rigor in qualitative research. Juried paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Social Work and Research, Austin, TX.
8. Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to enhance academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, 185-197.
9. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Anzul, M., & Downing, M. (1997). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
10. Fais-Borda, O. (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. Bogota, Columbia: Cinep.
11. Fine, M. (1994). Working the hyphens: Reinventing the self and other in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 70-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Glaser, B.,& Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
13. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1997). Composing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Greene, J. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. LeCompte, M., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative studies. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Padgett, D., Yedidia, M., Kerner, J., & Mandelblatt, J. (2001). The emotional consequences of false positive mammography: African American women's reactions in their own words. Women and Health, 33(3/4), 1-14.
18. Padgett, D. (2004). The Qualitative Research Experience. New York: Wadsworth Publishing.
19. Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Richardson, L. (1998). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 345-371). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Riessman, C. K. (1994). Preface: Making room for diversity in social work research. In C. K. Riessman (Ed.), Qualitative studies in social work (pp. vii-xx). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Wells, K. (1995). The strategy of grounded theory: Possibilities and problems. Social Work Research, 19, 33-37.
23. Wolcott, H. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.