Electronic crossmatching

Transfusion Medicine Reviews

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 75-79

  Arslan, Önder ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN ANTIBODY;

BLOOD COMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUP ABO SYSTEM; BLOOD GROUP TYPING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW;

EID: 29144528893     PISSN: 08877963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. R. Ottenberg Transfusion and the question of intravascular agglutination J. Exp. Med. 13 1911 425 438
2. L.I. Boral, and J.B. Henry The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures Transfusion 17 1977 163 168
3. BCSH Guidelines for compatibility testing in hospital blood banks B. Roberts Standard haematology practice 1989 Blackwell Oxford 150 163
4. B.A. Friedman, H.A. Oberman, and A.R. Chadwick The maximum surgical blood order schedule and the surgical blood use in the United States Transfusion 16 1976 380 387
5. AABB P.J. Schmidt Standards for blood banks and transfusion services 11 1984 AABB Arlington, USA
6. C.E. Milkins, J.F. Chapman, and S. Knowles Omission of the indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch. Is the direct agglutination test a good enough alternative? Transfusion 39 1999 (Suppl 95S)
7. H.A. Oberman, B.A. Barnes, and E.A. Steiner Role of the crossmatch in testing for serologic incompatibility Transfusion 22 1982 12 16
8. H.A. Oberman, B.A. Barnes, and B.A. Friedman The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion Transfusion 18 1978 137 141
9. 2B red blood cells and B patient sera Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 86 1986 511 513
10. W.J. Judd, E.A. Steiner, and D.B. O'Donell Discrepancies in reverse ABO typing due to prozone: How safe is the immediate-spin crossmatch? Transfusion 28 1988 334 338
11. J.F. Chapman, C. Milkins, and D. Voak The computer crossmatch: A safe alternative to the serological crossmatch Transfus. Med. 10 2000 251 256
12. S.H. Butch, W.J. Judd, and E.A. Steiner Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: The computer cross-match Transfusion 34 1994 105 109
13. S.H. Butch, and W.J. Judd Experience with the electronic crossmatch: Errors and suggested improvements Transfusion 35 1995 (Suppl 24S, abstract)
14. A. Chan, J.C. Chan, and L.Y. Wong From maximum surgical blood ordering schedule to unlimited computer crossmatching: Evolution of blood transfusion for surgical patients at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong Transfus. Med. 6 1996 121 124
15. J. Safwenberg, C.F. Högman, and B. Cassemar Computerized delivery control-a useful and safe complement to the type and screen compatibility testing Vox. Sang. 72 1997 162 168
16. J. Georgsen, and T. Kristensen From serological to computer crossmatching in nine hospitals Vox. Sang. 74 1998 419 425 (Suppl 2)
17. C. Cox, A. Enno, and S. Deveridge Remote electronic release blood system Transfusion 37 1997 960 964
18. Klein HG. (ed): AAAB. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services (Standards), (ed 17). Bethesda, American Association of Blood Banks 1996, 15.100; 15.120; 33.
19. British Committee for Standardization in Haematology, and Blood Transfusion Task Force Guidelines for pretransfusion compatibility. Procedures in blood transfusion laboratories Transfus. Med. 6 1996 273 283
20. College of American Pathologists: Transfusion medicine (comprehensive) and educational challenge participant summary report J-C, 2001 I.I. Northfield, pp 13-14.
21. C.P. Engelfriet, and H.W. Reesink The use of computer crossmatch Vox. Sang. 80 2001 184 192
22. S.H. Butch, and W.J. Judd Requirements for the computer crossmatch (letter) Transfusion 34 1994 187
23. P. Ashford, D. Gozzard, and J. Jones Guidelines for blood bank computing Transfus. Med. 10 2000 307 314
24. S. Butch Computerization in transfusion service Vox. Sang. 83 2002 105 110 (Suppl 1)
25. A.O. Hemosoft A new software for blood bank and apheresis management Transfus. Apheresis Sci. 30 2004 193 196