Multihoming and compatibility

International Journal of Industrial Organization

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-67

  Doganoglu, Toker ^a   Wright, Julian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Multihoming; Network effects; Standards; Two sided markets

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STANDARDS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

COMPATIBILITY; MULTIHOMING; NETWORK EFFECTS; TWO-SIDED MARKETS;

BROADBAND NETWORKS;

EID: 29144521433     PISSN: 01677187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AOL, 2000. Letter from AOL/Time Warner to the FCC concerning IM, dated September 29, 2000. http://www.fcc.gov/mb/aoltw/aoltw.html.
2. Armstrong, M., 2005. Competition in two-sided markets, mimeo. University College London.
3. M. Armstrong, and J. Vickers Competitive price discrimination RAND Journal of Economics 32 2001 1 27
4. Bayer, R., Chan, M., 2004. Network externalities, demand inertia, and dynamic pricing in an experimental oligopoly market, mimeo. University of Adelaide.
5. B. Caillaud, and B. Jullien Chicken and egg: competition among intermediation service providers RAND Journal of Economics 34 2003 309 328
6. J. Church, and I. King Bilingualism and network externalities Canadian Journal of Economics 26 1993 337 345
7. J. Crémer, P. Rey, and J. Tirole Connectivity in the commercial Internet Journal of Industrial Economics 48 2000 433 472
8. A. De Palma, L. Leruth, and P. Regibeau Partial compatibility with network externalities and double purchase Information Economics and Policy 11 1999 209 227
9. D. Evans The antitrust economics of two-sided markets AEI-Brookings Joint Center 2002 (working paper 02-13)
10. J. Farrell, and S. Saloner Standardization, compatibility, and innovation RAND Journal of Economics 16 1985 70 83
11. J. Farrell, and G. Saloner Converters, compatibility and the control of interfaces Journal of Industrial Economics 40 1992 9 35
12. Faulhaber, G.R., Farber, D.J., 2003. Comments of Professor Gerald R. Faulhaber and David J. Farber on AOL Time Warner's petition for relief, dated April 2, 2003. http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/instantmessaging.html.
13. FCC, 2000. AOL/Time Warner, Memorandum opinion and order, FCC 01-12, 16 FCC Rcd 6547, Released on January 22, 2001. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01012.pdf.
14. FCC, 2003. Memorandum opinion and order, Released on August 20, 2003. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-193A1.pdf.
15. K. Griva, and N. Vettas Price competition in a differentiated products duopoly under network effects CEPR Discussion Paper 4574 2004
16. M. Katz, and C. Shapiro Network externalities, competition and compatibility American Economic Review 75 1985 424 440
17. Mueller, M., 1989. The telephone war: interconnection, competition, monopoly in the making of universal telephone service, 1894-1920, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
18. J.-C. Rochet, and J. Tirole Platform competition in two-sided markets Journal of the European Economic Association 1 2003 990 1029
19. O. Shy The Economics of Network Industries 2001 Cambridge University Press