Performance testing of segregated hot-mix asphalt samples to evaluate segregation models

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1907, 2005, Pages 118-127

  Wu, Junxia ^a   Romero, Pedro ^a  

^a University of Utah   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

ASPHALT CONCRETE; SUPERPAVE® SHEAR TESTER (SST);

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS;

EID: 29144515523     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1907-14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Stroup-Gardiner, M., and E. R. Brown. NCHRP Report 441: Segregation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
2. Segregation: Causes and Cures for Hot Mix Asphalt. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1997.
3. Williams, R. C., G. R. Duncan, Jr., and T. D. White. Sources, Measurement, and Effects of Segregated Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavement. Report FHWA-SA-96-016. FHWA, McLean, Va., 1996.
4. Chang, C.-M., G. Y. Baladi, and T. F. Wolff. Detecting Segregation in Bituminous Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 77-86.
5. Wu, J.-X., and P. Romero. Analysis of Multivariate Models for Evaluating Segregation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1900, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 33-40.
6. Mertler, C. A., and R. A. Vannatta. Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. Pyrczak Publishing, Los Angeles, Calif., 2002.
7. Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Wichern. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1992.
8. Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 1985.
9. Shenoy, A., and P. Romero. Superpave Shear Tester as a Simple Standardized Measure to Evaluate Aggregate-Asphalt Mixture Performance. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2001, pp. 50-62.
10. Shenoy, A., and P. Romero. Standardized Procedure for Analysis of Dynamic Modulus |E*| Data to Predict Asphalt Pavement Distresses. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 173-182.
11. Romero, P., and F. Kuhnow. Evaluation of New Nonnuclear Pavement Density Gauges with Data from Field Projects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 47-54.
12. Romero, P. Laboratory Evaluation of the Pavement Quality Indicator Model 300. Final Report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
13. Prowell, B. D., and M. C. Dudley. Evaluation of Measurement Techniques for Asphalt Pavement Density and Permeability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 36-45.
14. Hausman, J. J., and W. G. Buttlar. Analysis of TransTech Model 300 Pavement Quality Indicator: Laboratory and Field Studies for Determining Asphalt Pavement Density. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 191-200.
15. Vijayagopal, L. Laboratory Simulation of Fine Segregation in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. M.S. thesis. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 2004.